Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient Outcomes after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Pooled Survival Analysis of Different Adverse Events

Klok, Frederikus A., Zondag, Wendy, van Kralingen, Klaas W., van Dijk, Arie P. J., Tamsma, Jouke T., Heyning, Fenna H., Vliegen, Hubert W., Huisman, Menno V.·2010·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: There is a lack of information on the long-term prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term risk for adverse events after PE. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with PE between January 2001 and July 2007, and patients in whom PE was ruled out from a previous study were followed until July 2008 for the occurrence of adverse clinical events: mortality, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, cancer, arterial cardiovascular events and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Hazard ratios (HR) for all endpoints and a combined endpoint were calculated and adjusted for potential confounders. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients with unprovoked, 558 with provoked, and 334 without PE were studied with a median follow-up period of 3.3 years. Patients with unprovoked PE had a lower overall risk for mortality than patients with provoked PE (HR, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.82), but a higher risk for nonmalignancy-related mortality (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), recurrent venous thromboembolism (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.1), cancer (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.0-10), cardiovascular events (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-3.8) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (1.5 vs. 0%). The risk for the combined endpoint did not differ between both groups (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.1). Patients without PE had similar risks for malignancy and cardiovascular events than patients with provoked PE, but lower risks for the remaining outcomes. The fraction of both patients with provoked and unprovoked PE without events after 1 year was only 70% and decreased to fewer than 60% after 2 years and fewer than 50% after 4 years, whereas this latter was 84% for the control patients. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of acute PE is complicated by high rates of serious adverse events, which occur in half of the patients within 4 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200907-1141oc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Klok, F. A., Zondag, W., van Kralingen, K. W., van Dijk, A. P. J., Tamsma, J. T., Heyning, F. H., Vliegen, H. W., & Huisman, M. V.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
181
Issue
5
Pages
501-506
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1840187991
Cited by
163
References
3
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Outcomes after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Pooled Survival Analysis of Different Adverse Events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200907-1141oc
The paper
Klok, F. A., Zondag, W., van Kralingen, K. W., van Dijk, A. P. J., Tamsma, J. T., Heyning, F. H., Vliegen, H. W., & Huisman, M. V. (2010). Patient Outcomes after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Pooled Survival Analysis of Different Adverse Events. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200907-1141oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.