Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature

Ende-Verhaar, Yvonne M., Cannegieter, Suzanne C., Vonk Noordegraaf, Anton, Delcroix, Marion, Pruszczyk, Piotr, Mairuhu, Albert T.A., Huisman, Menno V., Klok, Frederikus A.·2017·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after pulmonary embolism (PE) is relevant for management decisions but is currently unknown. We performed a meta-analysis of studies including consecutive PE patients followed for CTEPH. Study cohorts were predefined as “all comers”, “survivors” or “survivors without major comorbidities”. CTEPH incidences were calculated using random effects models. We selected 16 studies totalling 4047 PE patients who were mostly followed up for >2-years. In 1186 all comers (two studies), the pooled CTEPH incidence was 0.56% (95% CI 0.1–1.0). In 999 survivors (four studies) CTEPH incidence was 3.2% (95% CI 2.0–4.4). In 1775 survivors without major comorbidities (nine studies), CTEPH incidence was 2.8% (95% CI 1.5–4.1). Both recurrent venous thromboembolism and unprovoked PE were significantly associated with a higher risk of CTEPH, with odds ratios of 3.2 (95% CI 1.7–5.9) and 4.1 (95% CI 2.1–8.2) respectively. The pooled CTEPH incidence in 12 studies that did not use right heart catheterisation as the diagnostic standard was 6.3% (95% CI 4.1–8.4). The 0.56% incidence in the all-comer group probably provides the best reflection of the incidence of CTEPH after PE on the population level. The ∼3% incidences in the survivor categories may be more relevant for daily clinical practice. Studies that assessed CTEPH diagnosis by tests other than right heart catheterisation provide overestimated CTEPH incidences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.01792-2016

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Ende-Verhaar, Y. M., Cannegieter, S. C., Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Delcroix, M., Pruszczyk, P., Mairuhu, A. T. A., Huisman, M. V., & Klok, F. A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2017-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
1601792
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2589199695
Cited by
521
References
49
FWCI
34.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.01792-2016
The paper
Ende-Verhaar, Y. M., Cannegieter, S. C., Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Delcroix, M., Pruszczyk, P., Mairuhu, A. T. A., Huisman, M. V., & Klok, F. A. (2017). Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01792-2016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.