Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study of AMG 317, an IL-4Rα Antagonist, in Patients with Asthma

Corren, Jonathan, Busse, William, Meltzer, Eli O., Mansfield, Lyndon, Bensch, George, Fahrenholz, John, Wenzel, Sally E., Chon, Yun, Dunn, Meleana, Weng, Haoling H., Lin, Shao-Lee·2010·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: IL-4 and IL-13 share many biological functions important in the development of allergic airway inflammation and are implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma. AMG 317 is a fully human monoclonal antibody to IL-4Ralpha that blocks both IL-4 and IL-13 pathways. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of AMG 317 in patients with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo or AMG 317 (75-300 mg) for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) symptom score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean ACQ change (SE) was -0.49 (0.09) in placebo (n = 74), and -0.43 (0.11), -0.58 (0.12), and -0.70 (0.09) in the AMG 317 75 mg (n = 73), 150 mg (n = 73), and 300 mg (n = 74) groups, respectively (treatment effect P = 0.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in the secondary endpoints. Numerical decreases in number of and time to exacerbations were noted in patients receiving AMG 317 150 mg and 300 mg. Preplanned analyses by tertile of baseline ACQ revealed that patients with higher baseline ACQ scores (>or=2.86) were more likely to respond to AMG 317. Serious adverse events were reported in three patients, each noted as not related to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: AMG 317 did not demonstrate clinical efficacy across the overall group of patients. Clinically significant improvements were observed in several outcome measures in patients with higher baseline ACQ scores. AMG 317 was safe and well tolerated in this study population. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00436670).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200909-1448oc

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Corren, J., Busse, W., Meltzer, E. O., Mansfield, L., Bensch, G., Fahrenholz, J., Wenzel, S. E., Chon, Y., Dunn, M., Weng, H. H., & Lin, S.-L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2010-04-15
Volume
181
Issue
8
Pages
788-796
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2149810044
Cited by
299
References
22
FWCI
24.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study of AMG 317, an IL-4Rα Antagonist, in Patients with Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200909-1448oc
The paper
Corren, J., Busse, W., Meltzer, E. O., Mansfield, L., Bensch, G., Fahrenholz, J., Wenzel, S. E., Chon, Y., Dunn, M., Weng, H. H., & Lin, S.-L. (2010). A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study of AMG 317, an IL-4Rα Antagonist, in Patients with Asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200909-1448oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.