Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease

Waters, Valerie, Yau, Yvonne, Prasad, Sudha, Lu, Annie, Atenafu, Eshetu, Crandall, Ian, Tom, Stephanie, Tullis, Elizabeth, Ratjen, Felix·2011·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the more common multidrug-resistant organisms isolated from the respiratory tract of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but the effect of chronic S. maltophilia infection on CF lung disease is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of chronic S. maltophilia infection on lung disease in CF. METHODS: We developed a serologic assay specific for S. maltophilia and in a cross-sectional study, measured serum antibodies to S. maltophilia in patients with CF to determine if a definition of chronic S. maltophilia isolation based on culture results corresponded to an immunologic response (serologic study). We then used this validated definition to examine the effect of chronic S. maltophilia on the severity of lung disease in a retrospective cohort study using the Toronto CF Database from 1997-2008 (cohort study). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum antibody levels to S. maltophilia were measured in 179 patients with CF. Patients with chronic S. maltophilia had significantly higher mean antibody levels to S. maltophilia flagellin (P < 0.0001) and whole cell (P = 0.0004) compared with patients with intermittent or no S. maltophilia. The cohort study included 692 patients with an average follow-up of 8.3 years. In an adjusted log linear model, patients with chronic S. maltophilia infection had a significantly increased risk of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics compared with patients who had never had S. maltophilia (relative risk = 1.63; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic S. maltophilia infection in patients with CF is associated with a specific immune response to this organism and is an independent risk factor for pulmonary exacerbations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201009-1392oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., Tom, S., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
183
Issue
5
Pages
635-640
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2144124312
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201009-1392oc
The paper
Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., Tom, S., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F. (2011). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201009-1392oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.