The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease
Abstract
RATIONALE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the more common multidrug-resistant organisms isolated from the respiratory tract of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but the effect of chronic S. maltophilia infection on CF lung disease is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of chronic S. maltophilia infection on lung disease in CF. METHODS: We developed a serologic assay specific for S. maltophilia and in a cross-sectional study, measured serum antibodies to S. maltophilia in patients with CF to determine if a definition of chronic S. maltophilia isolation based on culture results corresponded to an immunologic response (serologic study). We then used this validated definition to examine the effect of chronic S. maltophilia on the severity of lung disease in a retrospective cohort study using the Toronto CF Database from 1997-2008 (cohort study). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum antibody levels to S. maltophilia were measured in 179 patients with CF. Patients with chronic S. maltophilia had significantly higher mean antibody levels to S. maltophilia flagellin (P < 0.0001) and whole cell (P = 0.0004) compared with patients with intermittent or no S. maltophilia. The cohort study included 692 patients with an average follow-up of 8.3 years. In an adjusted log linear model, patients with chronic S. maltophilia infection had a significantly increased risk of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics compared with patients who had never had S. maltophilia (relative risk = 1.63; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic S. maltophilia infection in patients with CF is associated with a specific immune response to this organism and is an independent risk factor for pulmonary exacerbations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of pulmonary exacerbations on long-term lung function decline in cystic fibrosis
Waters, V., Stanojevic, S., Atenafu, E. G., Lu, A., Yau, Y., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00159111 · Cited by 256
Self-citationAlterations of lung microbiota in a mouse model of LPS-induced lung injury
Poroyko, V., Meng, F., Meliton, A., Afonyushkin, T., Ulanov, A., Semenyuk, E., Latif, O., Tesic, V., Birukova, A. A., & Birukov, K. G. (2015) · American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00061.2014 · Cited by 102
Dixon, E. F., & Hall, R. A. (2015) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/cmi.12490 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., Tom, S., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 635-640
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2144124312
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201009-1392oc
- The paper
- Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., Tom, S., Tullis, E., & Ratjen, F. (2011). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis: Serologic Response and Effect on Lung Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201009-1392oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.