Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Implementation of a Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Treatment Bundle

Open access
Miller, Russell R., Dong, Li, Nelson, Nancy C., Brown, Samuel M., Kuttler, Kathryn G., Probst, Daniel R., Allen, Todd L., Clemmer, Terry P.·2013·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Severe sepsis and septic shock are leading causes of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, morbidity, and mortality. The effect of compliance with sepsis management guidelines on outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on mortality of compliance with a severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle. METHODS: Observational study of a severe sepsis and septic shock bundle as part of a quality improvement project in 18 ICUs in 11 hospitals in Utah and Idaho. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 4,329 adult subjects with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to study ICUs from the emergency department between January 2004 and December 2010, hospital mortality was 12.1%, declining from 21.2% in 2004 to 8.7% in 2010. All-or-none total bundle compliance increased from 4.9-73.4% simultaneously. Mortality declined from 21.7% in 2004 to 9.7% in 2010 among subjects noncompliant with one or more bundle element. Regression models adjusting for age, severity of illness, and comorbidities identified an association between mortality and compliance with each of inotropes and red cell transfusions, glucocorticoids, and lung-protective ventilation. Compliance with early resuscitation elements during the first 3 hours after emergency department admission caused ineligibility, through lower subsequent severity of illness, for these later bundle elements. CONCLUSIONS: Total severe sepsis and septic shock bundle compliances increased substantially and were associated with a marked reduction in hospital mortality after adjustment for age, severity of illness, and comorbidities in a multicenter ICU cohort. Early resuscitation bundle element compliance predicted ineligibility for subsequent bundle elements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201212-2199oc

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Miller, R. R., Dong, L., Nelson, N. C., Brown, S. M., Kuttler, K. G., Probst, D. R., Allen, T. L., & Clemmer, T. P.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
77-82
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2165583169
Cited by
253
References
4
FWCI
22.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Implementation of a Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Treatment Bundle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201212-2199oc
The paper
Miller, R. R., Dong, L., Nelson, N. C., Brown, S. M., Kuttler, K. G., Probst, D. R., Allen, T. L., & Clemmer, T. P. (2013). Multicenter Implementation of a Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Treatment Bundle. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201212-2199oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.