Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness in Adults

Fan, Eddy, Cheek, Fern, Chlan, Linda, Gosselink, Rik, Hart, Nicholas, Herridge, Margaret S., Hopkins, Ramona O., Hough, Catherine L., Kress, John P., Latronico, Nicola, Moss, Marc, Needham, Dale M., Rich, Mark M., Stevens, Robert D., Wilson, Kevin C., Winkelman, Chris, Zochodne, Doug W., Ali, Naeem A.·2014·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Profound muscle weakness during and after critical illness is termed intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW). OBJECTIVES: To develop diagnostic recommendations for ICUAW. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert committee generated diagnostic questions. A systematic review was performed, and recommendations were developed using the Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Severe sepsis, difficult ventilator liberation, and prolonged mechanical ventilation are associated with ICUAW. Physical rehabilitation improves outcomes in heterogeneous populations of ICU patients. Because it may not be feasible to provide universal physical rehabilitation, an alternative approach is to identify patients most likely to benefit. Patients with ICUAW may be such a group. Our review identified only one case series of patients with ICUAW who received physical therapy. When compared with a case series of patients with ICUAW who did not receive structured physical therapy, evidence suggested those who receive physical rehabilitation were more frequently discharged home rather than to a rehabilitative facility, although confidence intervals included no difference. Other interventions show promise, but fewer data proving patient benefit existed, thus precluding specific comment. Additionally, prior comorbidity was insufficiently defined to determine its influence on outcome, treatment response, or patient preferences for diagnostic efforts. We recommend controlled clinical trials in patients with ICUAW that compare physical rehabilitation with usual care and further research in understanding risk and patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Research that identifies treatments that benefit patients with ICUAW is necessary to determine whether the benefits of diagnostic testing for ICUAW outweigh its burdens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201411-2011st

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Fan, E., Cheek, F., Chlan, L., Gosselink, R., Hart, N., Herridge, M. S., Hopkins, R. O., Hough, C. L., Kress, J. P., Latronico, N., Moss, M., Needham, D. M., Rich, M. M., Stevens, R. D., Wilson, K. C., Winkelman, C., Zochodne, D. W., & Ali, N. A.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2014-12-15
Volume
190
Issue
12
Pages
1437-1446
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2109896310
Cited by
553
References
84
FWCI
18.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201411-2011st
The paper
Fan, E., Cheek, F., Chlan, L., Gosselink, R., Hart, N., Herridge, M. S., Hopkins, R. O., Hough, C. L., Kress, J. P., Latronico, N., Moss, M., Needham, D. M., Rich, M. M., Stevens, R. D., Wilson, K. C., Winkelman, C., Zochodne, D. W., & Ali, N. A. (2014). An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness in Adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201411-2011st

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.