Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Eosinophils: A Biomarker of Response to Extrafine Beclomethasone/Formoterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Open access
Siddiqui, Salman H., Guasconi, Alessandro, Vestbo, Jørgen, Jones, Paul, Agusti, Alvar, Paggiaro, Pierluigi, Wedzicha, Jadwiga A., Singh, Dave·2015·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Rationale. Blood eosinophilia has been shown to be associated with a significant proportion \nof COPD exacerbations and stratifies the clinical response to systemic corticosteroids. The \nFORWARD study was a randomised, double-blind, parallel group trial that compared 48 \nweeks treatment with extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate plus formoterol fumarate \n(BDP/FF) vs. FF, in severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbations. Objectives. We \nhypothesised that there would be treatment differences in response to BDP/FF when \nstratifying by baseline blood eosinophil count in a post hoc analysis. Methods. The patients \n(N=1,184) were stratified into four quartile groups based on the baseline eosinophil count and \nanalyses on exacerbation rate, change in pre dose FEV1 and St. George’s Respiratory \nQuestionnaire [SGRQ] total score over 48 weeks were performed across these. A predictive \nmodel of future exacerbations was developed based upon baseline blood eosinophil count and \nother factors. Results. The adjusted treatment difference over 48 weeks between the BDP/FF \nand FF groups was largest within the highest baseline blood eosinophil quartile (≥279.8/µl \n/µl). Within this quartile a significant (i) 46% reduction in exacerbation rate, (ii) 0.102 L \nimprovement in pre bronchodilator FEV1 and (iii) 5.9 units improvement in SGRQ total score \nwere seen in favour of BDP/FF. Predictive modelling suggested that the risk of exacerbations \nwas influenced by baseline blood eosinophils in patients treated with FF alone, but not in \npatients treated with BDP/FF. Conclusions. The presence of a significant blood eosinophilia \nseems to be associated with a particularly favorable response to ICS/LABA therapy in COPD \npatients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201502-0235le

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Siddiqui, S. H., Guasconi, A., Vestbo, J., Jones, P., Agusti, A., Paggiaro, P., Wedzicha, J. A., & Singh, D.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-08-15
Volume
192
Issue
4
Pages
523-525
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2146831425
Cited by
415
References
1
FWCI
41.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Eosinophils: A Biomarker of Response to Extrafine Beclomethasone/Formoterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201502-0235le
The paper
Siddiqui, S. H., Guasconi, A., Vestbo, J., Jones, P., Agusti, A., Paggiaro, P., Wedzicha, J. A., & Singh, D. (2015). Blood Eosinophils: A Biomarker of Response to Extrafine Beclomethasone/Formoterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201502-0235le

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.