Cited by 236Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Sustained Benefit from Ivacaftor Demonstrated by Combining Clinical Trial and Cystic Fibrosis Patient Registry Data

Sawicki, Gregory S., McKone, Edward F., Pasta, David J., Millar, Stefanie J., Wagener, Jeffrey S., Johnson, Charles A., Konstan, Michael W.·2015·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Rationale: In clinical trials, patients with cystic fibrosis and a G551D mutation who received ivacaftor experienced improvements in pulmonary and nutritional outcomes. However, whether these improvements reflect a change in disease trajectory cannot be determined without longer-term analyses with an appropriate comparator population. Objectives: To examine, over a 3-year period, whether ivacaftor therapy affects pulmonary function and nutritional measures in patients with CF with a G551D mutation compared with patients with CF who are homozygous for the F508del mutation. Methods: A propensity score was used to match patients with CF greater than or equal to 6 years of age who have a G551D mutation and received ivacaftor in clinical trials for up to 144 weeks with data from patients in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry who are homozygous for the F508del mutation. Matching was based on variables including age, sex, weight for age, height for age, body mass index for age, % predicted FEV1, and chronic therapies (dornase alfa, inhaled antibiotics, inhaled and oral corticosteroids). Measurements and Main Results: By calculating the annual estimated rate of decline in lung function for G551D patients receiving ivacaftor and comparing it with the rate of decline in lung function for matched F508del control patients, we show that the rate of lung function decline in G551D ivacaftor-treated patients was slower by nearly half. Moreover, treatment with ivacaftor is shown to improve body mass index and weight-for-age z scores for G551D patients over the 3-year analysis period. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ivacaftor is a disease-modifying therapy for the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201503-0578oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current benchmark for highly effective CFTR modulator therapy is ivacaftor for patients with the Gly551Asp CFTR mutation, in whom disease modification has been shown with long-term use, including decreased lung-function decline and decreased mortality.

    “The current benchmark for highly effective CFTR modulator therapy is ivacaftor for patients with the Gly551Asp CFTR mutation,10 in whom disease modification has been shown with long-term use, including decreased lung-function decline and decreased mortality.25-28”
  • Previous studies with IVA and TEZ/IVA showed that lung function declines more slowly in people with CF treated with IVA or TEZ/IVA than in those not taking CFTR modulators (by nearly 50% and 61.5%, respectively).

    “Previous studies with IVA and TEZ/IVA showed that lung function declines more slowly in people with CF treated with IVA or TEZ/IVA than in those not taking CFTR modulators (by nearly 50% and 61.5%, respectively), indicating that these therapies can modify CF disease progression by slowing lung function decline [11, 16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sawicki, G. S., McKone, E. F., Pasta, D. J., Millar, S. J., Wagener, J. S., Johnson, C. A., & Konstan, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE)
  • ICON Clinical Research, San Francisco, California
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Sawicki, Gregory S.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
192
Issue
7
Pages
836-842
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1780057455
Cited by
236
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 6
FWCI
22.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
ivacaftor, cystic fibrosis, G551D mutation, F508del mutation, lung function decline, disease-modifying therapy, body mass index, nutritional outcomes, CFTR modulator therapy, long-term outcomes, patient registry
MeSH terms
Aminophenols, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cystic Fibrosis, Humans, Lung, Nutritional Status, Registries, Respiratory Function Tests, Quinolones, Body Mass Index, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review