Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients

Open access
Langelier, Charles, Zinter, Matt S., Kalantar, Katrina, Yanik, Gregory A., Christenson, Stephanie, O’Donovan, Brian, White, Corin, Wilson, Michael, Sapru, Anil, Dvorak, Christopher C., Miller, Steve, Chiu, Charles Y., DeRisi, Joseph L.·2018·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

ABSTRACT RATIONALE Current microbiologic diagnostics often fail to identify the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in hematopoietic cellular transplant recipients (HCT), which precludes the implementation of targeted therapies. OBJECTIVES To address the need for improved LRTI diagnostics, we evaluated the utility of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to detect microbial pathogens in HCT patients with acute respiratory illnesses. METHODS We enrolled 22 post-HCT adults ages 19-69 years with acute respiratory illnesses who underwent BAL at the University of Michigan between January 2012 and May 2013. mNGS was performed on BAL fluid to detect microbes and simultaneously assess the host transcriptional response. Results were compared against conventional microbiologic assays. MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS mNGS demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting respiratory microbes (human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , human herpesvirus 6 and cytomegalovirus) when compared to standard testing. Previously unrecognized LRTI pathogens were identified in six patients for whom standard testing was negative (human coronavirus 229E, human rhinovirus A, Corynebacterium propinquum and Streptococcus mitis ); findings were confirmed by independent PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing. Relative to patients without infection, patients with infection had increased expression of immunity related genes (p=0.022) and significantly lower diversity of their respiratory microbiome (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS Compared to conventional diagnostics, mNGS enhanced detection of pathogens in BAL fluid from HCT patients. Furthermore, our results suggest that combining unbiased microbial pathogen detection with assessment of host gene biomarkers of immune response may hold promise for enhancing the diagnosis of post-HCT respiratory infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201706-1097le

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Langelier, C., Zinter, M. S., Kalantar, K., Yanik, G. A., Christenson, S., O’Donovan, B., White, C., Wilson, M., Sapru, A., Dvorak, C. C., Miller, S., Chiu, C. Y., & DeRisi, J. L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
524-528
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2726960688
Cited by
235
References
5
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201706-1097le
The paper
Langelier, C., Zinter, M. S., Kalantar, K., Yanik, G. A., Christenson, S., O’Donovan, B., White, C., Wilson, M., Sapru, A., Dvorak, C. C., Miller, S., Chiu, C. Y., & DeRisi, J. L. (2018). Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201706-1097le

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.