Cited by 184Asthma and respiratory diseasesIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Anti–Interleukin-9 Antibody Treatment Inhibits Airway Inflammation and Hyperreactivity in Mouse Asthma Model

Cheng, Gang, Arima, Masafumi, Honda, Kyoko, Hirata, Hirokuni, Eda, Fukiko, Yoshida, Nozomi, Fukushima, Fumiya, Ishii, Yoshiki +1 more·2002·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies in both animals and patients with asthma have shown that interleukin (IL)-9 is an important inflammatory mediator in asthma. To examine the effects of IL-9 antagonism on airway inflammation, ovalbumin-sensitized BALB/c mice were intravenously given anti–IL-9 antibody or an isotype-matched control antibody 30 minutes before challenge with aerosolized ovalbumin. Airway response to methacholine was measured, and samples of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were obtained 24 hours after the last antigen challenge. Lung tissue was harvested and examined histopathologically. After ovalbumin challenge, there were significant increases in airway hyperreactivity, the numbers of inflammatory cells in lung, and IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 production in BALF. Treatment with anti–IL-9 antibody significantly prevented airway hyperreactivity in response to methacholine inhalation. Blockade of IL-9 reduced the numbers of eosinophils (0.3 ± 0.1 × 105 and 23.6 ± 0.5 × 105/ml, anti–IL-9 antibody/control immunoglobulin G) and lymphocytes (0.2 ± 0.2 × 105 and 0.8 ± 0.1 × 105/ml) in BALF. Anti–IL-9 antibody treatment also reduced the concentrations of IL-4 (from 70.6 ± 4.6 to 30.8 ± 5.2 pg/ml), IL-5 (from 106.4 ± 12 to 54.4 ± 6.6 pg/ml), and IL-13 (from 44.2 ± 7.6 to 30.1 ± 5.5 pg/ml) in BALF. Macrophage-derived cytokine expression in the airways was also decreased by IL-9 blockade. Taken together, our findings emphasize the importance of IL-9 in the pathogenesis of asthma and suggest that blockade of IL-9 may be a new therapeutic strategy for bronchial asthma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.2105079

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, G., Arima, M., Honda, K., Hirata, H., Eda, F., Yoshida, N., Fukushima, F., Ishii, Y., & Fukuda, T.
Affiliations
Dokkyo University (JP)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
409-416
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2102621382
Cited by
184
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
IL-9, asthma, airway hyperresponsiveness, airway inflammation, ovalbumin sensitization, methacholine challenge, eosinophils, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, macrophage-derived cytokines, bronchoalveolar lavage
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Disease Models, Animal, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Respiratory System, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Interleukin-9, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review