A perspective for resolving the systematics of Rattus, the vertebrates with the most influence on human welfare
Open accessAbstract
The murid rodent genus Rattus Fischer 1803 contains several species that are responsible for massive loss of crops and food, extinction of other species and the spread of zoonotic diseases to humans, as well as a laboratory species used to answer important questions in physiology, immunology, pharmacology, toxicology, nutrition, behaviour and learning. Despite the well-known significant impacts of Rattus, a definitive evolutionary based systematic framework for the genus is not yet available. The past 75 years have seen more dramatic changes in membership of Rattus than in almost any other genus of mammals. In fact, the Rattus genus has been a receptacle for any generalised Old World murine that lacked morphological specialisation and at one point, has included more than 560 species and/or subspecies, spread across Eurasia, Africa and the Australo-Papuan region. The dissolution of Rattus is ongoing as many of its constituent species and many genera of Rattini remain unsampled in any molecular study. To address this sampling limitation, we sequenced the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene and examined phylogenetic relationships using both Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood algorithms for an expanded set of taxa within Rattus and among closely related genera. Here we place previously unsampled taxa in a phylogenetic context for the first time, including R. burrus, R. hoogerwerfi, R. lugens, and R. mindorensis within the Asian Rattus group, R. facetus within the Australo-Papuan Rattus radiation, and the undescribed ‘Bisa Rat’ described by Flannery as sister to the recently described genus Halmaheramys. We also present an exploratory foray into the wider topic of Rattus phylogenetics and propose that a reorganisation of the Rattus genus should require that it be a monophyletic group, include at least the type species R. norvegicus and R. rattus (plus their close allies); and exclude the Bandicota/Nesokia clade and other such specialised genera.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Identifying which species are recognized and how they are defined affects inferred biodiversity patterns at local, regional, and global scales, including assessments of conservation priorities and threats.
“Progress in this arena is critical because identifying which species are recognized and how they are defined affects inferred biodiversity patterns at local, regional, and global scales, including assessments of conservation priorities and threats (Mace 2004; Thomson et al. 2018).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Thomson et al. 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- THOMSON, V., WIEWEL, A., CHINEN, A., MARYANTO, I., SINAGA, M. H., HOW, R., APLIN, K., & SUZUKI, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Indonesian Institute of Sciences (ID)
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Venue
- Zootaxa
- Publisher
- Magnolia Press
- Published
- 2018-08-15
- Volume
- 4459
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-452
- ISSN
- 1175-5326 (ISSN-L)
- 1175-5334
- OpenAlex
- W2886945667
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Locations
- Zootaxa (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H05508)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- Rattus, rodent systematics
- MeSH terms
- Africa, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Humans, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Cytochromes b, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review