The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual saliency estimation by nonlinearly integrating features using region covariances
Open accessAbstract
To detect visually salient elements of complex natural scenes, computational bottom-up saliency models commonly examine several feature channels such as color and orientation in parallel. They compute a separate feature map for each channel and then linearly combine these maps to produce a master saliency map. However, only a few studies have investigated how different feature dimensions contribute to the overall visual saliency. We address this integration issue and propose to use covariance matrices of simple image features (known as region covariance descriptors in the computer vision community; Tuzel, Porikli, & Meer, 2006) as meta-features for saliency estimation. As low-dimensional representations of image patches, region covariances capture local image structures better than standard linear filters, but more importantly, they naturally provide nonlinear integration of different features by modeling their correlations. We also show that first-order statistics of features could be easily incorporated to the proposed approach to improve the performance. Our experimental evaluation on several benchmark data sets demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-art models on various tasks including prediction of human eye fixations, salient object detection, and image-retargeting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026553619983 · Cited by 1,806
Cited by
Salient Object Detection: A Benchmark
Borji, A., Cheng, M.-M., Jiang, H., & Li, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2487833 · Cited by 1,364
What Do Different Evaluation Metrics Tell Us About Saliency Models?
Bylinskii, Z., Judd, T., Oliva, A., Torralba, A., & Durand, F. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2815601 · Cited by 802
DeepFix: A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Predicting Human Eye Fixations
Kruthiventi, S. S. S., Ayush, K., & Babu, R. V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2710620 · Cited by 478
Predicting Human Eye Fixations via an LSTM-Based Saliency Attentive Model
Cornia, M., Baraldi, L., Serra, G., & Cucchiara, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2851672 · Cited by 474
Large-Scale Optimization of Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural Images
Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Cox, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.358 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdem, E., & Erdem, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2013-03-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008066834
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual saliency estimation by nonlinearly integrating features using region covariances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/13.4.11
- The paper
- Erdem, E., & Erdem, A. (2013). Visual saliency estimation by nonlinearly integrating features using region covariances. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.4.11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.