Three-dimensional depth illusions in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: People with schizophrenia are less likely to perceive physically concave objects as convex (as in the hollow mask illusion). Are reduced depth illusions specific to schizophrenia or do they also occur in other illnesses in which psychotic symptoms occur, such as bipolar disorder? Method: We compared a bipolar group (N=13) to previously examined healthy control (N=25) and schizophrenia (N=30) groups. Subjects made convexity judgments about 5 physical objects. Two were concave scenes ("reverspectives"), two were concave faces, and one was a convex face (catch stimulus). A reverspective and a concave face were painted with life-like texture; the remaining objects were uniformly colored. All five objects were viewed twice—once monocularly with the subject moving left-right (to create motion parallax) and once stereoscopically with the subject stationary (to isolate the role of binocular disparity). For each viewing, subjects were probed every 12 seconds over 2 minutes on whether the object appeared convex or concave. Results: There were no significant differences between the three subject groups in perceiving the catch stimulus (p>.4). For concave objects, schizophrenia patients gave more accurate (veridical) responses than controls (p<.05) but bipolar patients did not differ significantly from either of the other groups (p>.12). However, the group comparisons depended on symptoms: The 15 most psychotic schizophrenia patients clearly differed from the bipolar and control groups (p<.05); the 15 least psychotic patients differed from neither the bipolar nor control group. None of the group differences depended on texture, object-type or viewing condition (ps>.24). Conclusions: We conclude that concave objects produce fewer depth illusions in schizophrenia than bipolar disorder but only if schizophrenia patients are sufficiently psychotic. We also found that the group difference is constant across different object types and viewing conditions, suggesting that positive symptoms may disrupt a generic convexity prior. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies comparing schizophrenia with bipolar or major depressive disorder found that the latter two groups were normally sensitive to Binocular depth inversion and Contrast modulation, significantly different from schizophrenia patients.
“studies that directly compared patients who suffered from schizophrenia with patients who suffered from bipolar or major depressive disorders found that the latter two groups were normally sensitive to Binocular depth inversion (Schneider et al., 2002; Koethe et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013) and Contrast modulation (Dakin et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2013), which was significantly different from the”
From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia
Notredame, C.-E., Pins, D., Deneve, S., & Jardri, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00063 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“…disorders found that the latter two groups were normally sensitive to Binocular depth inversion (Schneider et al., 2002; Koethe et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013) and Contrast modulation (Dakin et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2013), which was significantly different from the patients with…”
ResultA inversão visual da profundidade na esquizofrenia
Alves, A., Fukusima, S. S., Quaglia, M. A. C., & Silva, J. A. D. (2018) · Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/0047-2085000000183 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Critérios de decisão na ilusão da máscara côncava na esquizofrenia
Alves, A., Fukusima, S. S., Quaglia, M. A. C., & Silva, J. A. D. (2020) · Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/0047-2085000000278
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Keane, B., Silverstein, S., & Papathomas, T.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2013-07-25
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 269-269
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987608319
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- illusion of depth, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, psychotic symptoms, positive symptoms, binocular disparity, motion parallax, 3D perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review