The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real World Goals Are Fickle and Volatile: Consuming High Fat Foods Reduces Distraction from Entirely Irrelevant High-Fat Foods
Open accessAbstract
Due to the limited processing capacity of the human visual system, it is critical to selectively respond to stimuli that are the most relevant to our current goals. While much of the research on goal-driven attentional capture investigates goals developed through artificial training (e.g. red stimuli are worth $1.00), it has failed to investigate whether naturally occurring goal states also influence attentional deployment. In the present study, we used images of high-fat foods as a case study. We hypothesized that since high-fat foods are desired by most individuals, we should see a larger amount of distraction for these images compared to other non-food objects (e.g. a bicycle). Utilizing a similar task to Forster & Lavie (2011), observers were asked to make continuous sequential forced-choice responses to each of 4 symbols in the center of the screen (e.g., is it a letter or number?). This task provided a unique experimental setup that allowed for the brief onset (125 msecs) of distractor images to be entirely irrelevant. In Experiment 1, we presented observers with three kinds of distractor images: high-fat foods, low-fat foods, and non-food objects. Results revealed that observers were significantly more distracted by high-fat foods, compared to non-food objects and even low-fat foods, suggesting observers rapidly assessed the nutritional value of the distractor images. In Experiment 2, we investigated the lability of these naturally occurring goal states by having observers consume a high-fat food (a candy bar) prior to the task. The amount of distraction by the high-fat food images was significantly less than distraction by images of low-fat foods and images of non-food objects, resulting in a significant interaction across the two experiments. These results (replicated in a second pair of experiments) demonstrate that while naturally occurring goal states can be difficult to ignore, they are also highly flexible. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies that manipulated the state of individuals to observe reward effects (e.g., by depriving them of water: Seitz et al., 2009; or food: Cunningham & Egeth, 2016) suggest that state-dependent fluctuations within a single individual may also affect the expression of reward-based selection history bias.”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Cunningham & Egeth, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y · Cited by 345
“Studies that manipulated the state of individuals to observe reward effects (e.g., by depriving them of water: Seitz et al., 2009; or food: Cunningham & Egeth, 2016) suggest that state-dependent fluctuations within a single individual may also affect the 3 Several studies found an effect of reward…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunningham, C., & Egeth, H.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1136
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2570830862
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Vision (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- goal-driven attention, attentional capture, distraction, high-fat foods, food images, visual attention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review