Cited by 2Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Real World Goals Are Fickle and Volatile: Consuming High Fat Foods Reduces Distraction from Entirely Irrelevant High-Fat Foods

Open access
Cunningham, Corbin, Egeth, Howard·2016·Journal of Vision

Abstract

Due to the limited processing capacity of the human visual system, it is critical to selectively respond to stimuli that are the most relevant to our current goals. While much of the research on goal-driven attentional capture investigates goals developed through artificial training (e.g. red stimuli are worth $1.00), it has failed to investigate whether naturally occurring goal states also influence attentional deployment. In the present study, we used images of high-fat foods as a case study. We hypothesized that since high-fat foods are desired by most individuals, we should see a larger amount of distraction for these images compared to other non-food objects (e.g. a bicycle). Utilizing a similar task to Forster & Lavie (2011), observers were asked to make continuous sequential forced-choice responses to each of 4 symbols in the center of the screen (e.g., is it a letter or number?). This task provided a unique experimental setup that allowed for the brief onset (125 msecs) of distractor images to be entirely irrelevant. In Experiment 1, we presented observers with three kinds of distractor images: high-fat foods, low-fat foods, and non-food objects. Results revealed that observers were significantly more distracted by high-fat foods, compared to non-food objects and even low-fat foods, suggesting observers rapidly assessed the nutritional value of the distractor images. In Experiment 2, we investigated the lability of these naturally occurring goal states by having observers consume a high-fat food (a candy bar) prior to the task. The amount of distraction by the high-fat food images was significantly less than distraction by images of low-fat foods and images of non-food objects, resulting in a significant interaction across the two experiments. These results (replicated in a second pair of experiments) demonstrate that while naturally occurring goal states can be difficult to ignore, they are also highly flexible. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/16.12.1136

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Cunningham, C., & Egeth, H.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Vision
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1136
ISSN
1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570830862
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Vision (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
goal-driven attention, attentional capture, distraction, high-fat foods, food images, visual attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review