The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics
Open accessAbstract
We propose a definition of saliency by considering what the visual system is trying to optimize when directing attention. The resulting model is a Bayesian framework from which bottom-up saliency emerges naturally as the self-information of visual features, and overall saliency (incorporating top-down information with bottom-up saliency) emerges as the pointwise mutual information between the features and the target when searching for a target. An implementation of our framework demonstrates that our model's bottom-up saliency maps perform as well as or better than existing algorithms in predicting people's fixations in free viewing. Unlike existing saliency measures, which depend on the statistics of the particular image being viewed, our measure of saliency is derived from natural image statistics, obtained in advance from a collection of natural images. For this reason, we call our model SUN (Saliency Using Natural statistics). A measure of saliency based on natural image statistics, rather than based on a single test image, provides a straightforward explanation for many search asymmetries observed in humans; the statistics of a single test image lead to predictions that are not consistent with these asymmetries. In our model, saliency is computed locally, which is consistent with the neuroanatomy of the early visual system and results in an efficient algorithm with few free parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211502 · Cited by 1,907
Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification
Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn870 · Cited by 600
Cited by
Bernal, J., Sánchez, F. J., Fernández-Esparrach, G., Gil, D., Rodríguez, C., & Vilariño, F. (2015) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.02.007 · Cited by 2,191
Five factors that guide attention in visual search
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0058 · Cited by 875
Saliency, attention, and visual search: An information theoretic approach
Bruce, N. D. B., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2009) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/9.3.5 · Cited by 855
Jiang, M., Huang, S., Duan, J., & Zhao, Q. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298710 · Cited by 729
Bayesian Saliency via Low and Mid Level Cues
Xie, Y., Lu, H., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2216276 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Tong, M. H., Marks, T. K., Shan, H., & Cottrell, G. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2008-12-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133589685
- Cited by
- 1,227
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 50.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/8.7.32
- The paper
- Zhang, L., Tong, M. H., Marks, T. K., Shan, H., & Cottrell, G. W. (2008). SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.7.32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.