The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VEGF164(165)as the Pathological Isoform: Differential Leukocyte and Endothelial Responses through VEGFR1 and VEGFR2
Abstract
PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces angiogenesis and vascular permeability and is thought to be operative in several ocular vascular diseases. The VEGF isoforms are highly conserved among species; however, little is known about their differential biological functions in adult tissue. In the current study, the inflammatory potential of two prevalent VEGF isoform splice variants, VEGF(120(121)) and VEGF(164(165)), was studied in the transparent and avascular adult mouse cornea. METHODS: Controlled-release pellets containing equimolar amounts of VEGF(120) and VEGF(164) were implanted in corneas. The mechanisms underlying this differential response of VEGF isoforms were explored. The response of VEGF in cultured endothelial cells was determined by Western blot analysis. The response of VEGF isoforms in leukocytes was also investigated. RESULTS: VEGF(164) was found to be significantly more potent at inducing inflammation. In vivo blockade of VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 significantly suppressed VEGF(164)-induced corneal inflammation. In vitro, VEGF(165) more potently stimulated intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression on endothelial cells, an effect that was mediated by VEGFR2. VEGF(164) was also more potent at inducing the chemotaxis of monocytes, an effect that was mediated by VEGFR1. In an immortalized human leukocyte cell line, VEGF(165) was found to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of VEGFR1 more efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data identify VEGF(164(165)) as a proinflammatory isoform and identify multiple mechanisms underlying its proinflammatory biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Houck, K. A., Leung, D. W., Rowland, A. M., Winer, J., & Ferrara, N. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)35712-0 · Cited by 1,127
Cited by
FERRARA, N., DAMICO, L., SHAMS, N., LOWMAN, H., & KIM, R. (2006) · Retina · doi:10.1097/01.iae.0000242842.14624.e7 · Cited by 849
The succinate receptor GPR91 in neurons has a major role in retinal angiogenesis
Sapieha, P., Sirinyan, M., Hamel, D., Zaniolo, K., Joyal, J.-S., Cho, J.-H., Honoré, J.-C., Kermorvant-Duchemin, E., Varma, D. R., Tremblay, S., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1873 · Cited by 359
Bevacizumab as a Potent Inhibitor of Inflammatory Corneal Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis
Bock, F., Onderka, J., Dietrich, T., Bachmann, B., Kruse, F. E., Paschke, M., Zahn, G., & Cursiefen, C. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0570 · Cited by 320
Norton, L. W., Koschwanez, H. E., Wisniewski, N. A., Klitzman, B., & Reichert, W. M. (2007) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31088 · Cited by 128
Chen, Y., Hu, Y., Moiseyev, G., Zhou, K. K., Chen, D., & Ma, J.-X. (2009) · Microvascular Research · doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2009.02.005 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Usui, T., Ishida, S., Yamashiro, K., Kaji, Y., Poulaki, V., Moore, J., Moore, T., Amano, S., Horikawa, Y., Dartt, D., Golding, M., Shima, D. T., & Adamis, A. P.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 368
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2098582960
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.