The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjunctival Proinflammatory and Proapoptotic Effects of Latanoprost and Preserved and Unpreserved Timolol: An Ex Vivo and In Vitro Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol on conjunctival cells. Expression of inflammatory markers and MUC5AC-related mucin production were evaluated by impression cytology in a case-control ex vivo study. The proapoptotic effect of the same drugs was also evaluated in vitro in a conjunctival cell line and compared with that of benzalkonium chloride (BAC). METHODS: Impression cytology (IC) specimens were obtained from a series of normal subjects and from patients with glaucoma treated for at least 1 year with latanoprost eye drops or preserved or unpreserved timolol. All groups were comparable in age and duration of treatment. Expression of HLA-DR, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and mucin was evaluated in a masked manner by flow cytometry. For the in vitro study, a human conjunctiva-derived cell line was treated with 0.02% BAC-containing latanoprost or timolol, unpreserved timolol, or 0.02% BAC alone for 15 minutes, followed or not by 4 or 24 hours of cell recovery in normal medium. Cell viability and chromatin condensation were evaluated using microplate cold light cytofluorometry with the neutral red and the Hoechst 33342 tests, respectively. The Hoechst-neutral red ratio was defined for the apoptosis assay, and cytoskeleton changes were assessed by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: No difference was found between normal eyes and those receiving unpreserved timolol. Preserved latanoprost and timolol significantly increased the inflammatory marker expression and decreased MUC5AC expression, but to a significantly higher extent in the preserved timolol group compared with latanoprost. In vitro, 0.02% BAC-containing timolol and latanoprost triggered conjunctival cell apoptosis-however, to a significantly lesser extent than did 0.02% BAC alone. Unpreserved timolol did not cause any cell toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These ex vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that BAC-containing latanoprost and timolol exhibit higher proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects on conjunctival cells than does unpreserved timolol. Latanoprost caused less toxicity, however, than preserved timolol, and both drugs were less toxic than BAC alone. These results suggest a potential protective effect of the prostaglandin analogue and to a lesser extent of timolol against the toxicity of BAC in conjunctival cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative free glaucoma medication
Pisella, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.4.418 · Cited by 618
Self-citationAlm, A., & Stjernschantz, J. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30798-1 · Cited by 502
Comparison of Latanoprost and Timolol in Patients with Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma
Camras, C. B. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30749-5 · Cited by 494
Decreased levels of the goblet cell mucin MUC5AC in tears of patients with Sjögren syndrome.
Argüeso, P., Balaram, M., Spurr-Michaud, S. J., Keutmann, H. T., Dana, M. R., & Gipson, I. K. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 348
Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells.
Jean, M. D. S., Brignole‐Baudouin, F., Bringuier, A. F., Bauchet, A.-L., Feldmann, G., & Baudouin, C. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 313
Belloc, F., Dumain, P., Boisseau, M. R., Jalloustre, C., Reiffers, J., Bernard, P., & Lacombe, F. (1994) · Cytometry · doi:10.1002/cyto.990170108 · Cited by 250
De Saint Jean, M., Debbasch, C., Brignole, F., Rat, P., Warnet, J.-M., & Baudouin, C. (2000) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1076/0271-3683(200002)2021-dft085 · Cited by 172
Flow cytometric analysis of conjunctival epithelium in ocular rosacea and keratoconjunctivitis sicca
Pisella, P.-J., Brignole, F., Debbasch, C., Lozato, P.-A., Creuzot-Garcher, C., Bara, J., Saiag, P., Warnet, J.-M., & Baudouin, C. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00347-x · Cited by 170
Self-citationMUC5AC mucin is a component of the human precorneal tear film.
Jumblatt, M. M., McKenzie, R. W., & Jumblatt, J. E. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 130
DEBBASCH, C., Pisella, P., Jean, M. D. S., Rat, P., Warnet, J., & Baudouin, C. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 109
Self-citationCellular Origin of Mucins of the Ocular Surface Tear Film
Gipson, I. K., & Inatomi, T. (1998) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5359-5_32 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly
Baudouin, C., Labbé, A., Liang, H., Pauly, A., & Brignole-Baudouin, F. (2010) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.03.001 · Cited by 1,084
An insight into toxicity and human-health-related adverse consequences of cosmeceuticals—a review
Bilal, M., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.261 · Cited by 179
Melin, V. E., Melin, T. E., Dessify, B. J., Nguyen, C. T., Shea, C. S., & Hrubec, T. C. (2016) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.10.006 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisella, P.-J.
- Venue
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1360-1368
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062004643
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.