The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thickness and Birefringence of Healthy Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Tissue Measured with Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
PURPOSE: Thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and changes in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) birefringence may both precede clinically detectable glaucomatous vision loss. Early detection of RNFL changes may enable treatment to prevent permanent loss of vision. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) can provide objective information on RNFL thickness and birefringence. METHODS: PS-OCT scans around the optic nerve head (ONH) of two healthy young volunteers were made using 10 concentric circles of increasing radius. Both the mean RNFL thickness and mean retinal nerve fiber birefringence for each of 48 sectors on a circle were determined with data analysis. RESULTS: Both the RNFL thickness and birefringence varied as a function of sector around the ONH. The RNFL became thinner with increasing distance from the ONH. In contrast, the birefringence did not vary significantly as a function of radius. CONCLUSIONS: Birefringence of healthy RNFL is constant as a function of scan radius but varies as a function of position around the ONH, with higher thickness values occurring superior and inferior to the ONH. Measured double-pass phase retardation per unit depth around the ONH ranged between 0.10 and 0.35 deg/microm, equivalent to birefringences of 1.2 x 10(-4) and 4.1 x 10(-4) respectively, measured at a wavelength of 840 nm. Consequently, when a spatially constant birefringence around the ONH is assumed, the conversion of scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) phase-retardation measurements to RNFL thickness may yield incorrect values. The data do not invalidate the clinical value of a phase-retardation measurement, but affect the conversion of phase retardation to RNFL thickness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography
DREXLER, W., & FUJIMOTO, J. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.005 · Cited by 906
Optical Coherence Tomography: History, Current Status, and Laboratory Work
Gabriele, M. L., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H., Kagemann, L., Xu, J., Folio, L. S., & Schuman, J. S. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6312 · Cited by 310
Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography in the human eye
Pircher, M., Hitzenberger, C. K., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2011) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.06.003 · Cited by 288
Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review
Qi, J., & Elson, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201600152 · Cited by 268
Baumann, B., Baumann, S. O., Konegger, T., Pircher, M., Götzinger, E., Schlanitz, F., Schütze, C., Sattmann, H., Litschauer, M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., et al. (2012) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.3.001670 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Cense, B., Chen, T. C., Park, B. H., Pierce, M. C., & de Boer, J. F.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2606
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1993165378
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thickness and Birefringence of Healthy Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Tissue Measured with Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.03-1160
- The paper
- Cense, B., Chen, T. C., Park, B. H., Pierce, M. C., & de Boer, J. F. (2004). Thickness and Birefringence of Healthy Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Tissue Measured with Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-1160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.