The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Central Visual Function in Stargardt’s Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus with Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess photoreceptor morphology in patients with Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) and correlate it with visual acuity (VA). METHODS: This was a prospective observational case series. Fourteen patients with Stargardt's disease (nine women, five men; average age, 39 years; range, 27-53) were examined. A clinically viable UHR-OCT system employing a new, compact titanium sapphire laser was used, enabling a 3-microm axial resolution in the retina. All patients received a full ophthalmic examination, including fluorescein angiography. Outcome was judged by central transverse photoreceptor loss, central foveal thickness, VA, central atrophy according to fluorescein angiography, and fundus autofluorescence. RESULTS: UHR-OCT was capable of visualizing and quantifying regions of central transverse photoreceptor (PR) loss. All Stargardt patients with central atrophy had a complete loss of the central photoreceptor layer in the foveal region (mean transverse photoreceptor loss, 4390 +/- 2270 microm; range, 530-9240 microm). Patients without clinically evident central atrophy had an intact photoreceptor layer centrally, but had small, focal parafoveal defects. A correlation was detected between VA and transverse PR loss (Spearman rho=-0.60, P=0.03), which was confirmed on logistic regression analysis (R2=0.49, P=0.0001). Central foveal thickness was reduced in patients with Stargardt's disease (85 +/- 40 microm; range, 58-280 microm). The correlation was statistically significant with VA (Spearman rho=0.43, P=0.04), but not with transverse PR loss (Spearman rho=-0.23, P >>0.05). Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association of central foveal thickness with VA (R2=0.51, P=0.0001), but not with transverse PR loss (P >>0.05). The extent of atrophy seen in fluorescein angiography correlated with VA and transverse PR loss (Spearman rho=-0.51, P=0.007; Spearman rho=0.77, P=0.0001). Similar correlations were found with the maximum transverse diameter of fundus autofluorescence (Spearman rho=-0.72, P=0.008; Spearman rho=0.77, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahigh-resolution OCT demonstrates excellent visualization of intraretinal morphology and enables quantification of the photoreceptor layer. Thus, for the first time, an in vivo visualization and quantification of transverse, central photoreceptor loss and correlation with visual function is possible. Lower VA corresponds to a greater transverse photoreceptor loss, which also correlates with the extent of changes seen in fluorescein angiography and in fundus autofluorescence. Furthermore, reduced retinal thickness (i.e., atrophy of retinal layers) does not correlate with the transverse extent of PR loss. Thus, it seems that although there may be progressive atrophy of intraretinal layers, an intact photoreceptor layer leads to better VA. UHR-OCT may present a viable alternative to the assessment of central visual function, due to the easy, objective, and noninvasive data acquisition. Therefore, UHR-OCT could be of future use in judging patients' prognoses in Stargardt's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography
Drexler, W., Morgner, U., Ghanta, R. K., Kärtner, F. X., Schuman, J. S., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/86589 · Cited by 962
Self-citation
Cited by
Srinivasan, V. J., Wojtkowski, M., Witkin, A. J., Duker, J. S., Ko, T. H., Carvalho, M., Schuman, J. S., Kowalczyk, A., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2006) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.046 · Cited by 317
Self-citationCremers, F. P. M., Lee, W., Collin, R. W. J., & Allikmets, R. (2020) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100861 · Cited by 315
High-Resolution Imaging with Adaptive Optics in Patients with Inherited Retinal Degeneration
Duncan, J. L., Zhang, Y., Gandhi, J., Nakanishi, C., Othman, M., Branham, K. E. H., Swaroop, A., & Roorda, A. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1422 · Cited by 262
Macular dystrophies: Clinical and imaging features, molecular genetics and therapeutic options
Rahman, N., Georgiou, M., Khan, K. N., & Michaelides, M. (2020) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315086 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Ergun, E., Hermann, B., Wirtitsch, M., Unterhuber, A., Ko, T. H., Sattmann, H., Scholda, C., Fujimoto, J. G., Stur, M., & Drexler, W.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 310
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1989954254
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Central Visual Function in Stargardt’s Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus with Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-0212
- The paper
- Ergun, E., Hermann, B., Wirtitsch, M., Unterhuber, A., Ko, T. H., Sattmann, H., Scholda, C., Fujimoto, J. G., Stur, M., & Drexler, W. (2005). Assessment of Central Visual Function in Stargardt’s Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus with Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.