The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Congenital Stromal Dystrophy of the Cornea Caused by a Mutation in the Decorin Gene
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and pathologic characteristics of a family with a congenital stromal dystrophy of the cornea and to identify the genetic basis for this disorder. METHODS: All family members in three generations underwent ophthalmic examination. Stored corneal buttons were examined by transmission electron microscopy. Molecular genetic studies, including a genome-wide scan with microsatellite markers, linkage analysis, and DNA sequencing, were performed. RESULTS: The dystrophy was inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern and was seen as clouded corneas shortly after birth. No associated systemic abnormalities or congenital diseases were present. After penetrating keratoplasty (PK), the grafts remained completely clear in 56% of the eyes with a mean (range) observation period of 19.5 years (3-36). Transmission electron microscopy of corneal buttons revealed lamellae with normal arrangement of collagen fibrils separated by abnormal fibrillar layers. Genome-wide screening revealed linkage to chromosome 12q22, with a maximum LOD score of 4.68 at D12S351. Subsequent sequencing of candidate genes revealed a frameshift mutation in the DCN gene (c.967delT) that encodes for decorin, predicting a C-terminal truncation of the decorin protein (p.S323fsX5). CONCLUSIONS: The authors hypothesize that truncated decorin binds to collagen in a suboptimal way, disturbing the regularity of corneal collagen fibril formation and thereby causing corneal opacities. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first description of a disorder associated with an inherited alteration in the decorin gene in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extracellular matrix structure
Theocharis, A. D., Skandalis, S. S., Gialeli, C., & Karamanos, N. K. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001 · Cited by 2,598
Extracellular Matrix Molecules: Potential Targets in Pharmacotherapy
Järveläinen, H., Sainio, A., Koulu, M., Wight, T. N., & Penttinen, R. (2009) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.001289 · Cited by 566
The molecular basis of corneal transparency
Hassell, J. R., & Birk, D. E. (2010) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2010.06.021 · Cited by 557
Biological Functions of the Small Leucine-rich Proteoglycans: From Genetics to Signal Transduction
Schaefer, L., & Iozzo, R. V. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r800020200 · Cited by 549
The extracellular matrix as a multitasking player in disease
Theocharis, A. D., Manou, D., & Karamanos, N. K. (2019) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.14818 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Bredrup, C., Knappskog, P. M., Majewski, J., Rødahl, E., & Boman, H.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 420
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1973516953
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congenital Stromal Dystrophy of the Cornea Caused by a Mutation in the Decorin Gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-0804
- The paper
- Bredrup, C., Knappskog, P. M., Majewski, J., Rødahl, E., & Boman, H. (2005). Congenital Stromal Dystrophy of the Cornea Caused by a Mutation in the Decorin Gene. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.