The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Association between Visual Acuity and Central Retinal Thickness in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether visual acuity is related to central retinal thickness in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS: Visual acuities were measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts and optical coherence tomography (OCT3) was used to calculate retinal thicknesses and grade third high-reflectance bands in 162 patients with the typical forms of retinitis pigmentosa who had Snellen visual acuities of 20/20 to 20/200, minimal to no cataracts, and no visible macular cysts. Sixty-five patients were retested within 2 months to estimate the intervisit variability of retinal thickness measurements. RESULTS: ETDRS acuity was best related to retinal thickness measured at fixation and as the average value over the central 1 mm by a second-order polynomial (r(2) = 0.38 and P < 0.001 in both cases). Acuity was maximal for intermediate retinal thickness and appeared to decline for both lesser and greater retinal thicknesses. By linear regression, the decline in acuity for decreasing retinal thickness was steeper in eyes with an absent third high-reflectance band than for eyes with a partially distinct band. No decline was noted in eyes with an intact band. Assessment of intervisit variability of retinal thickness measurements showed 98% confidence limits of +/-17 microm at fixation and +/-11 microm for the central 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Both retinal thinning (due to cell loss) and retinal thickening (due to presumed edema) appear to be associated with lower visual acuity in patients with typical retinitis pigmentosa. The definition of the OCT third high-reflectance band may help to predict which patients are more likely to lose visual acuity as retinal thickness declines. An increase or decrease in retinal thickness of more than 17 microm at fixation or 11 microm over the central 1 mm at follow-up can be considered a significant (P < 0.01) change in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hartong, D. T., Berson, E. L., & Dryja, T. P. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69740-7 · Cited by 2,924
Self-citationHamel, C. (2006) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-40 · Cited by 962
Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa
Verbakel, S. K., van Huet, R. A. C., Boon, C. J. F., den Hollander, A. I., Collin, R. W. J., Klaver, C. C. W., Hoyng, C. B., Roepman, R., & Klevering, B. J. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.005 · Cited by 973
Hauswirth, W. W., Aleman, T. S., Kaushal, S., Cideciyan, A. V., Schwartz, S. B., Wang, L., Conlon, T. J., Boye, S. L., Flotte, T. R., Byrne, B. J., et al. (2008) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2008.107 · Cited by 954
Jacobson, S. G. (2012) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.298 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandberg, M. A., Brockhurst, R. J., Gaudio, A. R., & Berson, E. L.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3349
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2087406399
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Association between Visual Acuity and Central Retinal Thickness in Retinitis Pigmentosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-1383
- The paper
- Sandberg, M. A., Brockhurst, R. J., Gaudio, A. R., & Berson, E. L. (2005). The Association between Visual Acuity and Central Retinal Thickness in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.