Cited by 90Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Paragraph Text Reading Using a Pixelized Prosthetic Vision Simulator: Parameter Dependence and Task Learning in Free-Viewing Conditions

Dagnelie, Gislin, Barnett, David, Humayun, Mark S., Thompson, Robert W.·2006·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of adequate reading by recipients of future prosthetic visual implants through simulation in sighted observers. METHODS: Four normally sighted subjects used a video headset to view short-story segments at a sixth grade reading level, presented in 6- to 11-word paragraphs through a pixelizing grid defined by five parameters (dot size, grid size, dot spacing, random dropout percentage, and gray-scale resolution). Grid parameters were varied individually, and four character sizes and two contrast levels were used. RESULTS: Reading speeds of 30 to 60 words per minute without errors were recorded for some parameter combinations. In general, reading accuracy and speed were influenced by all parameters. Reading accuracy exceeded 90% if the following conditions were met: At least 3 dots/charwidth were presented, and dropout did not exceed 50%. Reading speed deteriorated below 20 words per minute if accuracy fell below 90% and at low contrast if the grid spanned less than two characters. CONCLUSIONS: It is uncertain whether and to what extent retinal reorganization may limit the perception of multiple phosphenes by blind prosthesis recipients. If distinct phosphenes can be perceived, these results suggest that a 3 x 3-mm2 prosthesis with 16 x 16 electrodes should allow paragraph reading. The effects of stabilizing the dot grid on the retina must be investigated further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.05-0157

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cha et al. and Dagnelie et al. have shown that approximately 700 electrodes could provide a blind volunteer with useful visually guided mobility.

    “For example, Cha et al. (44) and Dagnelie et al. (45) have shown that approximately 700 electrodes could provide a blind volunteer with useful visually guided mobility.”
  • Providing some degree of functional vision to facilitate activities of daily living with only around 600-700 electrodes is possible.

    “In this framework, the possibility of providing some degree of functional vision to facilitate the activities of daily living with only around 600–700 electrodes is very encouraging (Dagnelie et al., 2006).”
  • The functional vision that could be restored with an array of intracortical microelectrodes implanted into the brain is in part related to the number of implanted electrodes, the interelectrode spacing, and the specific location of each microelectrode in the brain.

    “The functional vision that could be restored with an array of intracortical microelectrodes implanted into the brain is a function of many parameters, but it is in part related to the number of implanted electrodes, the interelectrode spacing, and the specific location of each microelectrode in the brain (Cha et al., 1992; Dagnelie et al., 2006).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 90

Authors
Dagnelie, G., Barnett, D., Humayun, M. S., & Thompson, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
1241
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2163749092
Cited by
90
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY12843, R01EY012843)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, paragraph reading, reading speed, reading accuracy, phosphenes, dot size, contrast, font size, task learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Reading, Sensory Aids, Vision, Ocular, Contrast Sensitivity, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review