Cited by 147Corneal Surgery and TreatmentsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceCorneal surgery and disorders

Replication competence and senescence in central and peripheral human corneal endothelium

Open access
Mimura, Tatsuya, Joyce, Nancy C.·2006·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare replication competence and senescence in human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) between the central and peripheral areas and between younger and older donors. METHODS: Human corneas were obtained from the eye bank and separated into two groups: young (younger than 30 years) and old (older than 50 years). Corneas were cut in quarters and a 2-mm scrape wound was created in the endothelium from the periphery to the center. Unwounded endothelium acted as a negative control. Corneal pieces were incubated for 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 hours in medium containing 8% fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus additional growth factors. Tissue was fixed, immunostained for minichromosome maintenance (MCM)-2, a marker of replication competence, and mounted in medium containing propidium iodide (PI) to visualize all nuclei. Fluorescence microscope images were used to count PI-stained and MCM2-positive HCECs in three 100-microm2 areas within the central and peripheral wound area. Results are expressed as mean number of cells/100 microm2. Senescent HCECs in ex vivo corneas were identified by staining for senescence-associated beta-galactosidase activity (SA-beta-Gal). Whole corneas were cut in quarters and incubated in staining solution containing SA-beta-Gal at pH 6.0. The number of cells stained for SA-beta-Gal and the grade of SA-beta-Gal intensity in three 100-microm2 areas were averaged for the central and peripheral areas from each donor. For all studies, results were compared between central and peripheral cornea and between younger and older donors. RESULTS: In both age groups (n = 4/group), cells repopulated the wound area in a time-dependent manner. In corneas from older donors, significantly fewer HCECs migrated into the wound bed in the central cornea than in the periphery. At each time point, the density of cells in the central wound area was lower in corneas from older donors than from younger donors. In both age groups, the mean percentage of MCM2-positive cells increased with time until wound healing. In both age groups, more MCM2-positive cells were present in the wounded area of the peripheral than of the central cornea. At 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after wounding, the percentage of MCM2-positive cells in the central or peripheral area of older corneas was significantly less than in the corresponding region in younger corneas. No MCM2-positive staining was observed in unwounded areas at any time point. HCECs in corneas from younger donors (n = 4) showed little to no SA-beta-Gal activity in either the central or peripheral area. SA-beta-Gal activity was easily detectable in corneas from older donors (n = 4) and a significantly higher percentage of central HCECs showed strong SA-beta-Gal activity compared with HCECs in the periphery. CONCLUSIONS: In ex vivo corneas, HCECs from the peripheral area retain higher replication competence, regardless of donor age. HCECs in the central area of corneas from older donors retain replicative competence, but the relative percentage of cells that are competent to replicate is significantly lower than in the periphery or in the central area of corneas from younger donors. This reduction in replicative competence negatively correlates with the observed increase in the population of central HCECs exhibiting senescence-like characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.05-1199

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endothelial cells in the central 3 mm of the cornea suffer increased age-related oxidative damage compared to cells further out.

    “the endothelial cells in the central 3 mm of the cornea suffer increased age-related (probably ultraviolet-induced) oxidative damage compared to cells further out (Mimura and Joyce, 2006, Joyce et al., 2009).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Mimura and Joyce, 2006

    The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information, not findings about oxidative damage. Searches for central-versus-peripheral damage, the central 3 mm, and ultraviolet exposure found no substantive passage, so the available copy cannot verify this claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mimura, T., & Joyce, N. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1387
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2006474545
Cited by
147
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY012700)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
Keywords
corneal endothelial cells, cellular senescence, corneal wound healing, donor age, MCM2, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, endothelial cell migration, ex vivo cornea, cell proliferation, corneal endothelium
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, beta-Galactosidase, Cell Division, Cell Movement, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Replication, Endothelium, Corneal, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Wound Healing, Cellular Senescence, Cell Cycle Proteins, Cell Culture Techniques, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review