Replication competence and senescence in central and peripheral human corneal endothelium
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To compare replication competence and senescence in human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) between the central and peripheral areas and between younger and older donors. METHODS: Human corneas were obtained from the eye bank and separated into two groups: young (younger than 30 years) and old (older than 50 years). Corneas were cut in quarters and a 2-mm scrape wound was created in the endothelium from the periphery to the center. Unwounded endothelium acted as a negative control. Corneal pieces were incubated for 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 hours in medium containing 8% fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus additional growth factors. Tissue was fixed, immunostained for minichromosome maintenance (MCM)-2, a marker of replication competence, and mounted in medium containing propidium iodide (PI) to visualize all nuclei. Fluorescence microscope images were used to count PI-stained and MCM2-positive HCECs in three 100-microm2 areas within the central and peripheral wound area. Results are expressed as mean number of cells/100 microm2. Senescent HCECs in ex vivo corneas were identified by staining for senescence-associated beta-galactosidase activity (SA-beta-Gal). Whole corneas were cut in quarters and incubated in staining solution containing SA-beta-Gal at pH 6.0. The number of cells stained for SA-beta-Gal and the grade of SA-beta-Gal intensity in three 100-microm2 areas were averaged for the central and peripheral areas from each donor. For all studies, results were compared between central and peripheral cornea and between younger and older donors. RESULTS: In both age groups (n = 4/group), cells repopulated the wound area in a time-dependent manner. In corneas from older donors, significantly fewer HCECs migrated into the wound bed in the central cornea than in the periphery. At each time point, the density of cells in the central wound area was lower in corneas from older donors than from younger donors. In both age groups, the mean percentage of MCM2-positive cells increased with time until wound healing. In both age groups, more MCM2-positive cells were present in the wounded area of the peripheral than of the central cornea. At 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after wounding, the percentage of MCM2-positive cells in the central or peripheral area of older corneas was significantly less than in the corresponding region in younger corneas. No MCM2-positive staining was observed in unwounded areas at any time point. HCECs in corneas from younger donors (n = 4) showed little to no SA-beta-Gal activity in either the central or peripheral area. SA-beta-Gal activity was easily detectable in corneas from older donors (n = 4) and a significantly higher percentage of central HCECs showed strong SA-beta-Gal activity compared with HCECs in the periphery. CONCLUSIONS: In ex vivo corneas, HCECs from the peripheral area retain higher replication competence, regardless of donor age. HCECs in the central area of corneas from older donors retain replicative competence, but the relative percentage of cells that are competent to replicate is significantly lower than in the periphery or in the central area of corneas from younger donors. This reduction in replicative competence negatively correlates with the observed increase in the population of central HCECs exhibiting senescence-like characteristics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endothelial cells in the central 3 mm of the cornea suffer increased age-related oxidative damage compared to cells further out.
“the endothelial cells in the central 3 mm of the cornea suffer increased age-related (probably ultraviolet-induced) oxidative damage compared to cells further out (Mimura and Joyce, 2006, Joyce et al., 2009).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Mimura and Joyce, 2006
The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information, not findings about oxidative damage. Searches for central-versus-peripheral damage, the central 3 mm, and ultraviolet exposure found no substantive passage, so the available copy cannot verify this claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kurz, D. J., Decary, S., Hong, Y., & Erusalimsky, J. D. (2000) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.113.20.3613 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fat tissue, aging, and cellular senescence
Tchkonia, T., Morbeck, D. E., Von Zglinicki, T., Van Deursen, J., Lustgarten, J., Scrable, H., Khosla, S., Jensen, M. D., & Kirkland, J. L. (2010) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00608.x · Cited by 1,094 · see citing works
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Nalapareddy, K., Jiang, H., Gutierrez, L. M. G., & Rudolph, K. L. (2008) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2008.09.002 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mimura, T., & Joyce, N. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Mimura, Tatsuya
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1387
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2006474545
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.teikyo.jp
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY012700)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Keywords
- corneal endothelial cells, cellular senescence, corneal wound healing, donor age, MCM2, senescence-associated β-galactosidase, endothelial cell migration, ex vivo cornea, cell proliferation, corneal endothelium
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, beta-Galactosidase, Cell Division, Cell Movement, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Replication, Endothelium, Corneal, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Wound Healing, Cellular Senescence, Cell Cycle Proteins, Cell Culture Techniques, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review