Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultivated Corneal Endothelial Cell Sheet Transplantation in a Primate Model

Koizumi, Noriko, Sakamoto, Yuji, Okumura, Naoki, Okahara, Norio, Tsuchiya, Hideaki, Torii, Ryuzo, Cooper, Leanne J., Ban, Yuriko, Tanioka, Hidetoshi, Kinoshita, Shigeru·2007·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of cultivated corneal endothelial cell transplantation in a primate model. METHODS: Monkey corneal endothelial cells (MCECs) obtained from three cynomolgus monkeys were cultivated, with subcultures grown on collagen type I carriers for 4 weeks. The corneal endothelium of the right eye of six monkeys was mechanically scraped, after which a cultivated MCEC sheet was brought into the anterior chamber of four eyes and fixed to Descemet's membrane by air. As the control, a collagen sheet without MCECs was transplanted into one eye of one monkey, and a suspension of cultivated MCECs was injected into the anterior chamber in one eye. RESULTS: Cultivated MCECs produced a confluent monolayer of closely attached hexagonal cells that showed both ZO-1 and Na(+)-K(+) ATPase expression. In the early postoperative period MCEC sheets were attached to Descemet's membrane and corneal clarity was recovered. The recovered clarity was accompanied by a decrease in corneal thickness. Fluorescein DiI labeled donor corneal endothelial cells were detected on the host cornea on postoperative day 7. Six months after transplantation MCEC-transplanted corneas remained clear, and hexagonal cells were observed by in vivo specular microscopy with a density of 1992 to 2475 cells/mm(2). Control eyes showed irreversible bullous keratopathy that precluded pachymetry and specular microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: A model of cultivated corneal endothelial transplantation for corneal endothelial dysfunction was established in primates whose corneal endothelial cells have less proliferative capacity in vivo. Our results suggest that this is a useful model for long-term observation in advance of the future clinical application of cultivated corneal endothelial transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.07-0567

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Koizumi, N., Sakamoto, Y., Okumura, N., Okahara, N., Tsuchiya, H., Torii, R., Cooper, L. J., Ban, Y., Tanioka, H., & Kinoshita, S.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2007-10-01
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
4519
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2009101760
Cited by
216
References
1
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultivated Corneal Endothelial Cell Sheet Transplantation in a Primate Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.07-0567
The paper
Koizumi, N., Sakamoto, Y., Okumura, N., Okahara, N., Tsuchiya, H., Torii, R., Cooper, L. J., Ban, Y., Tanioka, H., & Kinoshita, S. (2007). Cultivated Corneal Endothelial Cell Sheet Transplantation in a Primate Model. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0567

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.