Cited by 117

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expression of VLDLR in the Retina and Evolution of Subretinal Neovascularization in the Knockout Mouse Model’s Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation

Hu, Wenzheng, Jiang, Aihua, Liang, Jing, Meng, Hongdi, Chang, Bo, Gao, Hua, Qiao, Xiaoxi·2008·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

Purpose Very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) in knockout mice (vldlr(-/-)) has been reported to induce subretinal neovascularization. Therefore, VLDLR expression in the wild-type mouse retina was investigated and the retinal angiogenic process in vldlr(-/-) mice was characterized. Methods VLDLR expression in the retina and in purified retinal vascular endothelial cells (RECs) and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. Angiogenic evolution in vldlr(-/-) mice was examined by fundus fluorescein angiography, histology, double-staining of FITC-dextran perfusion and elastin immunohistochemistry, isolectin staining, and confocal fluorescence microscopy. Results VLDLR mRNA was detected in the wild-type mouse retina and in purified RECs and RPE cells. The VLDLR protein was localized in the RPE layer, vessels in the ganglion cell layer, and around the outer limiting membrane of the retina. The retinal pathogenic process in vldlr(-/-) mice recapitulates key features of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) in humans, a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). These include neovascular growth originating from retinal vessels and progressing to the subretinal space with intraretinal, subretinal, and choroidal angiogenic stages, RPE disruption and Bruch membrane exposure, retinal-choroidal anastomosis, subsequent photoreceptor degeneration, RPE hyperplasia,…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.07-0870

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hu, W., Jiang, A., Liang, J., Meng, H., Chang, B., Gao, H., & Qiao, X.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and the
  • Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
407
ISSN
1552-5783
Cited by
117
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review