Cited by 75Glaucoma and retinal disordersCorneal surgery and disordersBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The Circadian Curve of Intraocular Pressure: Can We Estimate Its Characteristics during Office Hours?

Open access
Fogagnolo, Paolo, Orzalesi, Nicola, Ferreras, Antonio, Rossetti, Luca·2009·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To verify whether office-hour measurements in patients in different body positions can estimate the characteristics of 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: The 24-hour IOP curves of 29 healthy subjects (10 young adults, 19 elderly) and 30 patients with untreated glaucoma were analyzed. Measurements were taken at 9 AM; 12, 3, 6, and 9 PM; and 12, 3, and 6 AM, both in the supine and sitting (Goldmann tonometer) positions. Peak, mean, and fluctuation of 24-hour IOP curves were compared with office-hour measurements obtained in subjects in the sitting position alone and with combined pressures obtained in the sitting and supine positions (four measurements in each body position from 9 AM to 6 PM). The percentage of subjects with estimates of all IOP parameters within a cutoff of +/-1 (peak and mean) and +/-2 mm Hg (fluctuation) was calculated. RESULTS: Office-hour sitting measurements correctly identified peak, mean, and IOP fluctuation in 10% of the young adults, 32% of the elderly control subjects, and 20% of the patients with glaucoma, whereas the combination of supine and sitting measurements correctly identified them in 30%, 85%, and 46% of cases, respectively. It is noteworthy that office-hour measurements did not characterize any 24-hour parameter in 20% of patients with glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sitting measurements alone, the collection of supine and sitting office-hour measurements may enhance the correct identification of 24-hour IOP characteristics in both control subjects and untreated patients with glaucoma, thus reducing the need for obtaining 24-hour curves to a minority of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.08-2889

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The normal range for intraocular pressure is reportedly 7-21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in intraocular pressure can show an approximate range of 3-7 mmHg.

    “The normal range for IOPs is reportedly 7–21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in IOP can show an approximate range of 3–7 mmHg [22–25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogagnolo, P., Orzalesi, N., Ferreras, A., & Rossetti, L.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione G.B. Bietti (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
2209
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W1964388951
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
intraocular pressure, circadian rhythm, IOP fluctuation, untreated glaucoma, posture
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Physicians' Offices, Posture, Retrospective Studies, Tonometry, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review