Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mitochondrial DNA Damage and Repair in RPE Associated with Aging and Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Open access
Lin, Haijiang, Xu, Haifeng, Liang, Fong-Qi, Liang, Hao, Gupta, Praveena, Havey, Anna N., Boulton, Michael E., Godley, Bernard F.·2011·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage may be associated with age-related diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The present study was designed to test whether the frequency of mtDNA damage, heteroplasmic mtDNA mutations, and repair capacity correlate with progression of AMD. METHODS: Macular and peripheral RPE cells were isolated and cultured from human donor eyes with and without AMD. The stages of AMD were graded according to the Minnesota Grading System. Confluent primary RPE cells were used to test the frequency of endogenous mtDNA damage by quantitative PCR. Mutation detection kits were used to detect heteroplasmic mtDNA mutation. To test the mtDNA repair capacity, cultured RPE cells were allowed to recover for 3 and 6 hours after exposure to H(2)O(2), and repair was assessed by quantitative PCR. The levels of human OGG1 protein, which is associated with mtDNA repair, were analyzed by Western blot. RESULTS: This study showed that mtDNA damage increased with aging and that more lesions occurred in RPE cells from the macular region than the periphery. Furthermore, mtDNA repair capacity decreased with aging, with less mtDNA repair capacity in the macular region compared with the periphery in samples from aged subjects. Most interestingly, the mtDNA damage was positively correlated with the grading level of AMD, whereas repair capacity was negatively correlated. In addition, more mitochondrial heteroplasmic mutations were detected in eyes with AMD. CONCLUSIONS: These data show macula-specific increases in mtDNA damage, heteroplasmic mutations, and diminished repair that are associated with aging and AMD severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.10-6163

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Lin, H., Xu, H., Liang, F.-Q., Liang, H., Gupta, P., Havey, A. N., Boulton, M. E., & Godley, B. F.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2011-05-26
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
3521
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2135700152
Cited by
163
References
5
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.