The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decrease in Rate of Myopia Progression with a Contact Lens Designed to Reduce Relative Peripheral Hyperopia: One-Year Results
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether a novel optical treatment using contact lenses to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia can slow the rate of progress of myopia. METHODS: Chinese children, aged 7 to 14 years, with baseline myopia from sphere -0.75 to -3.50 D and cylinder ≤1.00 D, were fitted with novel contact lenses (n = 45) and followed up for 12 months, and their progress was compared with that of a group (n = 40) matched for age, sex, refractive error, axial length, and parental myopia wearing normal, single-vision, spherocylindrical spectacles. RESULTS: On adjusting for parental myopia, sex, age, baseline spherical equivalent (SphE) values, and compliance, the estimated progression in SphE at 12 months was 34% less, at -0.57 D, with the novel contact lenses (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.45 -0.69 D) than at -0.86 D, with spectacle lenses (95% CI, -0.74 to -0.99 D). For an average baseline age of 11.2 years, baseline SphE of -2.10 D, a baseline axial length of 24.6 mm, and 320 days of compliant lens wear, the estimated increase in axial length (AL) was 33% less at 0.27 mm (95% CI, 0.22-0.32 mm) than at 0.40 mm (95% CI, 0.35-0.45 mm) for the contact lens and spectacle lens groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month data support the hypothesis that reducing peripheral hyperopia can alter central refractive development and reduce the rate of progress of myopia. (chictr.org number, chiCTR-TRC-00000029 or chiCTR-TRC-00000032.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
IMI – Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression Report
Wildsoet, C. F., Chia, A., Cho, P., Guggenheim, J. A., Polling, J. R., Read, S., Sankaridurg, P., Saw, S.-M., Trier, K., Walline, J. J., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25958 · Cited by 462
Self-citationBrennan, N. A., Toubouti, Y. M., Cheng, X., & Bullimore, M. A. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923 · Cited by 355
Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in Spain: Refractive and Biometric Changes
Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Villa-Collar, C., Gilmartin, B., & Gutiérrez-Ortega, R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8005 · Cited by 334
A Review of Current Concepts of the Etiology and Treatment of Myopia
Cooper, J., & Tkatchenko, A. V. (2018) · Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000499 · Cited by 293
Vision performance with a contact lens designed to slow myopia progression
Kollbaum, P. S., Jansen, M. E., Tan, J., Meyer, D. M., & Rickert, M. E. (2013) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e3182812205 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Sankaridurg, P., Holden, B., Smith, E., Naduvilath, T., Chen, X., de la Jara, P. L., Martinez, A., Kwan, J., Ho, A., Frick, K., & Ge, J.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2011-12-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 9362
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1990873100
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decrease in Rate of Myopia Progression with a Contact Lens Designed to Reduce Relative Peripheral Hyperopia: One-Year Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.11-7260
- The paper
- Sankaridurg, P., Holden, B., Smith, E., Naduvilath, T., Chen, X., de la Jara, P. L., Martinez, A., Kwan, J., Ho, A., Frick, K., & Ge, J. (2011). Decrease in Rate of Myopia Progression with a Contact Lens Designed to Reduce Relative Peripheral Hyperopia: One-Year Results. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.