The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Chinese Subjects
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study posterior choroidal thickness and its profile based on location in a healthy Chinese population and to determine its correlation with age and refractive error. METHODS: A total of 210 healthy volunteers (420 eyes) with no ophthalmic disease history were recruited. Choroidal scans were obtained for all eyes using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and choroidal thickness at 1 mm/3 mm temporal, nasal, superior, and inferior to the fovea were measured. RESULTS: The choroid was thickest underneath the fovea (261.93 ± 88.42 μm). At 1 mm and 3 mm to the fovea, the choroid temporally was thicker than nasally. Mean SFCT in subjects younger than 60 years of age were 294.63 ± 75.90 μm, and no correlation between SFCT and age was noted. Mean SFCT in subjects older than 60 years of age was 196.52 ± 74.42 μm, much thinner than that for subjects younger than 60 years of age. A significant negative correlation was found between SFCT and age in subjects older than 60 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Age is critical for evaluation of choroidal thickness. However, SFCT has no correlation with age in subjects younger than 60 years of age. In subjects older than 60 years of age, SFCT was significantly negatively correlated with age, and decreased by 5.40 μm for each year of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Spaide, R. F., Koizumi, H., & Pozonni, M. C. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032 · Cited by 2,180
A Pilot Study of Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography of the Choroid in Normal Eyes
Margolis, R., & Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.008 · Cited by 1,344
Metabolic dependence of photoreceptors on the choroid in the normal and detached retina.
Linsenmeier, R. A., & Padnick‐Silver, L. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 322
SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN FELLOW EYES OF PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY
Maruko, I., Iida, T., Sugano, Y., Ojima, A., & Sekiryu, T. (2011) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e31820f4b39 · Cited by 319
Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.005 · Cited by 307
Ikuno, Y., Maruko, I., Yasuno, Y., et al. (2011) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6811 · Cited by 235
Esmaeelpour, M., Považay, B., Hermann, B., Hofer, B., Kajic, V., Hale, S. L., North, R. V., Drexler, W., & Sheen, N. J. L. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6875 · Cited by 231
Esmaeelpour, M., Považay, B., Hermann, B., Hofer, B., Kajic, V., Kapoor, K., Sheen, N. J. L., North, R. V., & Drexler, W. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5196 · Cited by 222
Optical Coherence Tomography Enhanced Depth Imaging of Choroidal Tumors
Torres, V. L. L., Brugnoni, N., Kaiser, P. K., & Singh, A. D. (2011) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.028 · Cited by 187
de Bruin, D. M., Burnes, D. L., Loewenstein, J. I., Chen, Y., Chang, S., Chen, T. C., Esmaili, D. D., & de Boer, J. F. (2008) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1553 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness: The Beijing Eye Study
Wei, W. B., Xu, L., Jonas, J. B., Shao, L., Du, K. F., Wang, S., Chen, C. X., Xu, J., Wang, Y. X., Zhou, J. Q., et al. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.048 · Cited by 599
Ocular changes in TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer's disease
Tsai, Y., Lu, B., Ljubimov, A. V., Girman, S., Ross-Cisneros, F. N., Sadun, A. A., Svendsen, C. N., Cohen, R. M., & Wang, S. (2014) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12888 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, X., Li, J., Zeng, J., Ma, W., Liu, R., Li, T., Yu, S., & Tang, S.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2011-12-20
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 9555
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W3140378098
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
