The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Effect of Overnight Orthokeratology on Axial Length Elongation in Childhood Myopia: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our prospective study was conducted to compare axial length elongation in myopic children receiving long-term overnight orthokeratology (OK) treatment to those wearing spectacles as controls. METHODS: There were 59 subjects enrolled in this study. The OK group comprised 29 subjects who matched the inclusion criteria for OK. The control group comprised 30 subjects who also matched the inclusion criteria for OK, but preferred spectacles for myopia correction. Axial length was measured periodically for 5 years using an IOLMaster device, and the time course of changes was evaluated and compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 43 subjects (22 and 21 in the OK and control groups, respectively) completed the 5-year follow-up examinations. At baseline, the mean age ± SD was 10.04 ± 1.43 and 9.95 ± 1.59 years, the spherical equivalent refractive error was -1.89 ± 0.82 and -1.83 ± 1.06 diopters (D), and the axial length was 24.09 ± 0.77 and 24.22 ± 0.71 mm in the OK and control groups, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. The increase in axial length during the 5-year study period was 0.99 ± 0.47 and 1.41 ± 0.68 mm for the OK and control groups, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0236, unpaired t-test). The annual increases in axial length were significantly different between the groups for the first (P = 0.0002), second (P = 0.0476), and third years (P = 0.0385), but not for the fourth (P = 0.0938) and fifth (P = 0.8633) years. There were no severe complications throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The current 5-year follow-up study indicated that OK can suppress axial length elongation in childhood myopia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Retardation of Myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) Study: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
Cho, P., & Cheung, S.-W. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10565 · Cited by 818
Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions
Kollbaum, P. S., & Bradley, A. (2020) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12987 · Cited by 45
Oh, S.-K., Kim, J.-M., Yoon, G.-Y., Yoo, Y.-S., & Kim, D. Y. (2024) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics11040332 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hiraoka, T., Kakita, T., Okamoto, F., Takahashi, H., & Oshika, T.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2012-06-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3913
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2007355723
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Effect of Overnight Orthokeratology on Axial Length Elongation in Childhood Myopia: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.11-8453
- The paper
- Hiraoka, T., Kakita, T., Okamoto, F., Takahashi, H., & Oshika, T. (2012). Long-Term Effect of Overnight Orthokeratology on Axial Length Elongation in Childhood Myopia: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.