The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Clinically Invisible, but Optical Coherence Tomography Detected, Optic Disc Margin Anatomy on Neuroretinal Rim Evaluation
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated that most eyes have regionally variable extensions of Bruch's membrane (BM) inside the clinically identified disc margin (DM) that are clinically and photographically invisible. We studied the impact of these findings on DM- and BM opening (BMO)-derived neuroretinal rim parameters. METHODS: Disc stereo-photography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, 24 radial B-scans centered on the optic nerve head) were performed on 30 glaucoma patients and 10 age-matched controls. Photographs were colocalized to SD-OCT data such that the DM and BMO could be visualized in each B-scan. Three parameters were computed: (1) DM-horizontal rim width (HRW), the distance between the DM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) along the DM reference plane; (2) BMO-HRW, the distance between BMO and ILM along the BMO reference plane; and (3) BMO-minimum rim width (MRW), the minimum distance between BMO and ILM. Rank-order correlations of sectors ranked by rim width and spatial concordance measured as angular distances between equivalently ranked sectors were derived. RESULTS: The average DM position was external to BMO in all quadrants, except inferotemporally. There were significant sectoral differences among all three rim parameters. DM-HRW and BMO-HRW sector ranks were better correlated (median ρ = 0.84) than DM-HRW and BMO-MRW (median ρ = 0.55), or BMO-HRW and BMO-MRW (median ρ = 0.60) ranks. Sectors with the narrowest BMO-MRW were infrequently the same as those with the narrowest DM-HRW or BMO-HRW. CONCLUSIONS: BMO-MRW quantifies the neuroretinal rim from a true anatomical outer border and accounts for its variable trajectory at the point of measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three-dimensional Retinal Imaging with High-Speed Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography
Wojtkowski, M., Srinivasan, V., Fujimoto, J. G., Ko, T., Schuman, J. S., Kowalczyk, A., & Duker, J. S. (2005) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.023 · Cited by 640
A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA
Bengtsson, B., Olsson, J., Heijl, A., & Rootzén, H. (1997) · Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00392.x · Cited by 431
Deformation of the Lamina Cribrosa and Anterior Scleral Canal Wall in Early Experimental Glaucoma
Bellezza, A. J., Rintalan, C. J., Thompson, H. W., Downs, J. C., Hart, R. T., & Burgoyne, C. F. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.01-1282 · Cited by 372
Self-citationMwanza, J.-C., Chang, R. T., Budenz, D. L., Durbin, M. K., Gendy, M. G., Shi, W., & Feuer, W. J. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5222 · Cited by 300
Åsman, P. (1992) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180084033 · Cited by 295
Strouthidis, N. G., Fortune, B., Yang, H., Sigal, I. A., & Burgoyne, C. F. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5599 · Cited by 210
Self-citationSpectral domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma (an AOS thesis).
Schuman, J. S. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 166
Chen, T. C. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 125
Strouthidis, N. G., Yang, H., Fortune, B. A., Downs, J. C., & Burgoyne, C. F. (2009) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2302 · Cited by 103
Self-citationAutomated Analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Optic Disc Images by Glaucoma Probability Score
Coops, A., Henson, D. B., Kwartz, A. J., & Artes, P. H. (2006) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0579 · Cited by 93
Sharma, A., Oakley, J. D., Schiffman, J., Budenz, D. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2011) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.008 · Cited by 47
Diagnostic Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for Glaucoma
Ferreras, A., Pablo, L. E., Pajarín, A. B., Larrosa, J. M., Polo, V., & Pueyo, V. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.039 · Cited by 41
Reference Plane Definition and Reproducibility in Optic Nerve Head Images
Tan, J. C. H., & Hitchings, R. A. (2003) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0039 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Chauhan, B. C., & Burgoyne, C. F. (2013) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.016 · Cited by 278
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography imaging for glaucoma - today and tomorrow
Leung, C. K.-S. (2016) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/apo.0000000000000179 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Reis, A. S. C., O'Leary, N., Yang, H., Sharpe, G. P., Nicolela, M. T., Burgoyne, C. F., & Chauhan, B. C.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1852
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2139235771
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.