Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Confocal Imaging of the Retinal Microvasculature in the Human Retina

Open access
Tan, Priscilla Ern Zhi, Yu, Paula K., Balaratnasingam, Chandrakumar, Cringle, Stephen J., Morgan, William H., McAllister, Ian L., Yu, Dao-Yi·2012·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated quantitatively the distribution of blood vessels in different neural layers of the human retina. METHODS: A total of 16 human donor eyes was perfusion-fixed and labeled for endothelial f-actin. Retinal eccentricity located 3 mm superior to the optic disk was studied using confocal scanning laser microscopy. Immunohistochemical methods applied to whole-mount and transverse sections were used to colocalize capillary networks with neuronal elements. Capillary morphometry, diameter, and density measurements were compared among networks. RESULTS: Four different capillary networks were identified and quantified in the following regions: Nerve fiber layer (NFL), retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer, border of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and superficial boundary of the inner nuclear layer (INL), and boundary of the deep INL and outer plexiform layer. The innermost and outermost capillary networks demonstrated a laminar configuration, while IPL and deep INL networks displayed a complex three-dimensional configuration. Capillary diameter in RGC and IPL networks were significantly less than in other networks. Capillary density was greatest in the RGC network (26.74%), and was significantly greater than in the NFL (13.69%), IPL (11.28%), and deep INL (16.12%) networks. CONCLUSIONS: The unique metabolic demands of neuronal sub-compartments may influence the morphometric features of regional capillary networks. Differences in capillary diameter and density between networks may have important correlations with neuronal function in the human retina. These findings may be important for understanding pathogenic mechanisms in retinal vascular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.12-10017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Tan, P. E. Z., Yu, P. K., Balaratnasingam, C., Cringle, S. J., Morgan, W. H., McAllister, I. L., & Yu, D.-Y.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2012-08-17
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
5728
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2070486213
Cited by
205
References
1
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.