The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in Choroidal Thickness in Relation to the Severity of Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess changes in choroidal thickness in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) using enhanced-depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). METHODS: Among 235 eyes from 145 patients, 195 treatment-naïve eyes were divided into no DR, mild/moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR), severe NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR), and 40 eyes having a history of laser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were classified as PRP-treated DR. Eyes with no ocular treatment (195 eyes) were divided according to the presence of and to the subtypes of DME. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFChT) and parafoveal choroidal thickness (PFChT) at 1500 μm were measured using EDI-OCT. RESULTS: Mean age was 62.6 ± 12.4 years, and mean duration of DM was 15.1 ± 7.2 years. Mean SFChT in groups with no DR (40 eyes), mild/moderate NPDR (47 eyes), severe NPDR (72 eyes), PDR (36 eyes), and PRP-treated DR (40 eyes) was 262.3 ± 68.4 μm, 244.6 ± 77.0 μm, 291.1 ± 107.7 μm, 363.5 ± 74.9 μm, and 239.9 ± 57.4 μm, respectively. Mean SFChT was significantly greater in eyes with PDR than in those with no DR (P < 0.01), mild/moderate NPDR (P < 0.01), or severe NPDR (P < 0.05). Mean SFChT decreased significantly in PRP-treated DR compared with PDR (P < 0.01). Eyes with DME (67 eyes) had a thicker subfoveal choroid than eyes without DME (128 eyes; P < 0.05) and, compared with cystoid or diffuse types, SFChT was thickest in subretinal detachment (SRD)-type DME (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Choroidal thickness increased significantly as the severity worsened from mild/moderate/NPDR to PDR, and decreased in PRP-treated eyes. The subfoveal choroid was thicker in eyes with DME than in those without, and was thickest in eyes with SRD-type DME.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic retinopathy: current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies
Duh, E. J., Sun, J. K., & Stitt, A. W. (2017) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.93751 · Cited by 1,057
Agrawal, R., Gupta, P., Tan, K.-A., Cheung, C. M. G., Wong, T.-Y., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21090 · Cited by 721
Fang, X.-J., Yu, M., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z.-H., Wang, W.-W., Wang, Z.-X., & Yuan, Y. (2017) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.4103/0366-6999.204935 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J. T., Lee, D. H., Joe, S. G., Kim, J.-G., & Yoon, Y. H.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2013-05-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3378
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1991208188
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Choroidal Thickness in Relation to the Severity of Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.12-11503
- The paper
- Kim, J. T., Lee, D. H., Joe, S. G., Kim, J.-G., & Yoon, Y. H. (2013). Changes in Choroidal Thickness in Relation to the Severity of Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-11503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.