The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intravitreally Transplanted Dental Pulp Stem Cells Promote Neuroprotection and Axon Regeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells After Optic Nerve Injury
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential therapeutic benefit of intravitreally implanted dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) on axotomized adult rat retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) using in vitro and in vivo neural injury models. METHODS: Conditioned media collected from cultured rat DPSCs and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were assayed for nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) secretion using ELISA. DPSCs or BMSCs were cocultured with retinal cells, with or without Fc-TrK inhibitors, in a Transwell system, and the number of surviving βIII-tubulin⁺ retinal cells and length/number of βIII-tubulin⁺ neurites were quantified. For the in vivo study, DPSCs or BMSCs were transplanted into the vitreous body of the eye after a surgically induced optic nerve crush injury. At 7, 14, and 21 days postlesion (dpl), optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as a measure of axonal atrophy. At 21 dpl, numbers of Brn-3a⁺ RGCs in parasagittal retinal sections and growth-associated protein-43⁺ axons in longitudinal optic nerve sections were quantified as measures of RGC survival and axon regeneration, respectively. RESULTS: Both DPSCs and BMSCs secreted NGF, BDNF, and NT-3, with DPSCs secreting significantly higher titers of NGF and BDNF than BMSCs. DPSCs, and to a lesser extent BMSCs, promoted statistically significant survival and neuritogenesis/axogenesis of βIII-tubulin⁺ retinal cells in vitro and in vivo where the effects were abolished after TrK receptor blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal transplants of DPSCs promoted significant neurotrophin-mediated RGC survival and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nadal-Nicola´s, F. M., Jime´nez-Lo´pez, M., Sobrado-Calvo, P., Nieto-Lo´pez, L., Ca´novas-Marti´nez, I., Salinas-Navarro, M., Vidal-Sanz, M., & Agudo, M. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3267 · Cited by 541
Chen, H., & Weber, A. J. (2004) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.024 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Tatullo, M., Marrelli, M., Shakesheff, K. M., & White, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.1899 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Mead, B., Logan, A., Berry, M., Leadbeater, W., & Scheven, B. A.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2013-11-15
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7544
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2026770509
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.