Cited by 75Nerve injury and regenerationGlaucoma and retinal disordersRetinal Development and Disorders

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces TrkB protein and mRNA in the normal retina and following optic nerve crush in adult rats

Chen, Hao, Weber, Arthur J·2004·Brain Research

Abstract

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a well-known retinal neuroprotectant, but its effectiveness is limited: higher doses do not yield increased cell survival, multiple applications are not additive, and long-term delivery does not reverse, ganglion cell death. These limitations might reflect either injury- or BDNF-induced retinal changes in TrkB, the high affinity tyrosine kinase receptor used by BDNF. Retinal levels of TrkB protein and mRNA were measured in rats following intravitreal application of BDNF alone, optic nerve crush alone, and both. Full-length receptor protein levels (TrkB.FL) were determined by Western blot analysis and mRNA (trkB.FL) levels were measured using RNAse protection assay (RPA). BDNF alone produced a rapid and prolonged decrease in normal retina TrkB.FL. Nerve crush also resulted in decreased TrkB.FL, but the reduction was not apparent before 2-week post-crush. BDNF applied at the time of the crush yielded reductions in TrkB.FL similar to that of BDNF alone. With respect to TrkB mRNA levels, injection of BDNF into normal eyes and optic nerve crush alone showed bell-shaped patterns of change: approximately 50% below normal at 24-h post-procedure, approximately 50% above normal at 3 days, normal at 7 days, and approximately 50% below normal at 2-week post-procedure. When BDNF and nerve crush were combined, trkB-FL levels reached 90% of normal 1-week post-crush/injection. The data suggest that the limitation of BDNF in promoting ganglion cell survival following optic nerve injury results, in part, due to drug-induced down-regulation of the full-length TrkB receptor needed to activate intracellular pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.024

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., & Weber, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, Arthur J
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
1011
Issue
1
Pages
99-106
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986504481
Cited by
75
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (EY11159, R01EY011159)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, TrkB receptor, optic nerve crush, retinal ganglion cell survival, neuroprotection, receptor down-regulation, optic nerve injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Nerve Crush, Retina, Time Factors, Blotting, Western, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Optic Nerve Injuries, Receptor, trkB, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review