The appearance of phosphenes elicited using a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Phosphenes are the fundamental building blocks for presenting meaningful visual information to the visually impaired using a bionic eye device. The aim of this study was to characterize the size, shape, and location of phosphenes elicited using a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Methods: Three patients with profound vision loss due to retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with a suprachoroidal electrode array, which was used to deliver charge-balanced biphasic constant-current pulses at various rates, amplitudes, and durations to produce phosphenes. Tasks assessing phosphene appearance, location, overlap, and the patients' ability to recognize phosphenes were performed using a custom psychophysics setup. Results: Phosphenes were reliably elicited in all three patients, with marked differences in the reported appearances between patients and between electrodes. Phosphene shapes ranged from simple blobs to complex forms with multiple components in both space and time. Phosphene locations within the visual field generally corresponded to the retinotopic position of the stimulating electrodes. Overlap between phosphenes elicited from adjacent electrodes was observed with one patient, which reduced with increasing electrode separation. In a randomized recognition task, two patients correctly identified the electrode being stimulated for 57.2% and 23% of trials, respectively. Conclusions: Phosphenes of varying complexity were successfully elicited in all three patients, indicating that the suprachoroidal space is an efficacious site for electrically stimulating the retina. The recognition scores obtained with two patients suggest that a suprachoroidal implant can elicit phosphenes containing unique information. This information may be useful when combining phosphenes into more complex and meaningful images that provide functional vision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bipolar electrode configurations produced percepts similar in appearance to the summation of phosphenes elicited from the two individual electrodes using a monopolar configuration.
“Using a suprachoroidal prosthesis, Sinclair et al (2016) found that bipolar electrode configurations produced percepts that were similar in appearance to the summation of the phosphenes that were elicited from the two individual electrodes using a monopolar configuration.”
From Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users (2024) · cites this paper as Sinclair et al 2016
Phosphene appearance varies systematically with stimulus amplitude and frequency.
“In addition, phosphene appearance varies systematically with stimulus amplitude and frequency (Horsager et al 2009, Nanduri et al 2012, Sinclair et al 2016) to the extent that a simple computational model can predict phosphene shape across a wide range of stimulus parameters (Granley and Beyeler 2021).”
From Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users (2024) · cites this paper as Sinclair et al 2016
In suprachoroidal prostheses, phosphenes tend to appear thicker or rounder as the stimulation rate increases.
“This relationship between stimulus frequency and phosphene size partially agrees with data from suprachoroidal prostheses, where phosphenes tend to appear thicker or rounder as the stimulation rate increases (Sinclair et al 2016).”
From Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users (2024) · cites this paper as Sinclair et al 2016
A similar effect has also been observed with suprachoroidal implants, where the subjects described geometrically complex percepts.
“A similar effect has also been observed with suprachoroidal implants, where the subjects described geometrically complex percepts [141].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Sinclair, N. C., Shivdasani, M. N., Perera, T., Gillespie, L. N., McDermott, H. J., Ayton, L. N., Blamey, P. J., & for the Bionic Vision Australia Consortium
- Affiliations
- Bionics Institute (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sinclair, Nicholas C.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2016-09-21
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4948
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2523634951
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- phosphenes, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal prosthesis, retinal stimulation, electrode arrays, retinotopic mapping, electrode separation, visual prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review