The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Current Landscape and Knowledge Gaps
Open accessAbstract
1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 2 Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 3 Foundation Fighting Blindness, Columbia, MD, USA 4 Human Genetics Center, School of Public Health, and Ruiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA 5 Rose-Silverthorne Retinal Degenerations Laboratory, Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA 6 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 7 Center for Retinal Degenerations and Ophthalmic Genetic Diseases, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA 8 Vision Science, the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 9 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 10 Institut de la Vision-Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS-Paris, France 11 Departments of Ophthalmology, Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Genetics, and Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 12 Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Sun, X., Pawlyk, B. S., Xu, X., Liu, X., Bulgakov, O. V., Adamian, M., Sandberg, M. A., Khani, S. C., Tan, M.-H., Smith, A. J., et al. (2009) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2009.104 · Cited by 123
RetractedWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/483531a · Cited by 2,979
Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture
Eiraku, M., Takata, N., Ishibashi, H., Kawada, M., Sakakura, E., Okuda, S., Sekiguchi, K., Adachi, T., & Sasai, Y. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09941 · Cited by 2,001
Russell, S., Bennett, J., Wellman, J. A., Chung, D. C., Yu, Z.-F., Tillman, A., Wittes, J., Pappas, J., Elci, O., McCague, S., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31868-8 · Cited by 1,952
Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber’s congenital amaurosis
Bainbridge, J. W. B., Smith, A. J., Barker, S. S., Robbie, S., Henderson, R., Balaggan, K., Viswanathan, A., Holder, G. E., Stockman, A., Tyler, N., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0802268 · Cited by 1,924
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Prinz, F., Schlange, T., & Asadullah, K. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3439-c1 · Cited by 1,888
Fritsche, L. G., Igl, W., Bailey, J. N. C., Grassmann, F., Sengupta, S., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Burdon, K. P., Hebbring, S. J., Wen, C., Gorski, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3448 · Cited by 1,544
Self-citation
Cited by
Cehajic-Kapetanovic, J., Xue, K., Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara, C., Nanda, A., Davies, A., Wood, L. J., Salvetti, A. P., Fischer, M. D., Aylward, J. W., Barnard, A. R., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0763-1 · Cited by 368
The effects of PEGylation on LNP based mRNA delivery to the eye
Ryals, R. C., Patel, S., Acosta, C., McKinney, M., Pennesi, M. E., & Sahay, G. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241006 · Cited by 194
Garafalo, A. V., Cideciyan, A. V., Héon, E., Sheplock, R., Pearson, A., WeiYang Yu, C., Sumaroka, A., Aguirre, G. D., & Jacobson, S. G. (2020) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100827 · Cited by 173
Galvin, O., Chi, G., Brady, L., Hippert, C., Del Valle Rubido, M., Daly, A., & Michaelides, M. (2020) · Clinical Ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s241928 · Cited by 116
Buck, T., & Wijnholds, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21124197 · Cited by 92
“Novel medical therapies, such as gene therapies, need to be carefully optimized to demonstrate their efficacy and safety before going into clinical human trials [10].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, J. L., Pierce, E. A., Laster, A. M., Daiger, S. P., Birch, D. G., Ash, J. D., Iannaccone, A., Flannery, J. G., Sahel, J. A., Zack, D. J., Zarbin, M. A., & and the Foundation Fighting Blindness Scientific Advisory Board
- Venue
- Translational Vision Science & Technology
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 6
- ISSN
- 2164-2591 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883753288
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 137
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Current Landscape and Knowledge Gaps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/tvst.7.4.6
- The paper
- Duncan, J. L., Pierce, E. A., Laster, A. M., Daiger, S. P., Birch, D. G., Ash, J. D., Iannaccone, A., Flannery, J. G., Sahel, J. A., Zack, D. J., Zarbin, M. A., & and the Foundation Fighting Blindness Scientific Advisory Board. (2018). Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Current Landscape and Knowledge Gaps. Translational Vision Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.4.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
