Cited by 368Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Initial results from a first-in-human gene therapy trial on X-linked retinitis pigmentosa caused by mutations in RPGR

Open access
Cehajic-Kapetanovic, Jasmina, Xue, Kanmin, Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara, Cristina, Nanda, Anika, Davies, Alexandra, Wood, Laura J., Salvetti, Anna Paola, Fischer, M. Dominik +15 more·2020·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Retinal gene therapy has shown great promise in treating retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a primary photoreceptor degeneration that leads to severe sight loss in young people. In the present study, we report the first-in-human phase 1/2, dose-escalation clinical trial for X-linked RP caused by mutations in the RP GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene in 18 patients over up to 6 months of follow-up (https://clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT03116113). The primary outcome of the study was safety, and secondary outcomes included visual acuity, microperimetry and central retinal thickness. Apart from steroid-responsive subretinal inflammation in patients at the higher doses, there were no notable safety concerns after subretinal delivery of an adeno-associated viral vector encoding codon-optimized human RPGR (AAV8-coRPGR), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Visual field improvements beginning at 1 month and maintained to the last point of follow-up were observed in six patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-020-0763-1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In phase 1/2 dose-escalation trials for RPE65-associated LCA, choroideremia, and RPGR-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa, patients receiving higher doses of AAV presented with signs of retinal inflammation including vitritis, retinitis, and choroiditis.

    “In the phase 1/2 dose-escalation trials for RPE65-associated LCA, choroideremia, and retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa, patients receiving higher doses of AAV have presented with various signs of retinal inflammation, including vitritis, retinitis, and choroiditis,2,6,7 implicating the presence of a cell-mediated immune response.”

    From Characterizing the cellular immune response to subretinal AAV gene therapy in the murine retina (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dose-dependent retinal inflammation (GTAU) has been observed in many retinal gene therapy trials, limiting vector dose and therapeutic efficacy.

    “Despite the perceived low immunogenicity of AAV and relative immune privilege of the intraocular environment,8 dose-dependent retinal inflammation, or gene therapy-associated uveitis (GTAU), has been observed in many retinal gene therapy trials, which limits the vector dose and therapeutic efficacy.”

    From Characterizing the cellular immune response to subretinal AAV gene therapy in the murine retina (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results passage reports inflammation in 7 of 9 patients receiving higher vector concentrations, versus none in the lower-concentration cohorts. The Discussion says this inflammation potentially offset visual gains. The paper does not establish that dose-dependent inflammation occurred in many trials or that it limited the vector dose used; its efficacy conclusion is also more tentative than the citing sentence suggests. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many current retinal gene therapy trials adopt a standardized immunosuppression protocol up to 21 days post-treatment, which may ameliorate this immune response in humans.

    “Many current retinal gene therapy trials adopt a standardized immunosuppression protocol up to 21 days post-treatment, which may ameliorate this immune response in humans.6,7,40”

    From Characterizing the cellular immune response to subretinal AAV gene therapy in the murine retina (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods (Concomitant therapy; page not provided) report that every participant in this trial received a 21-day prednisolone course intended to minimize inflammation or immune responses; the Discussion reports that oral corticosteroids resolved inflammatory deposits. The source does not establish that many retinal gene therapy trials use this protocol, and this trial’s course began two days before treatment rather than lasting 21 days after it. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This vector has demonstrated successful rescue of retinal sensitivity and structure in a Phase I/II clinical trial with a favourable immune response profile.

    “This vector has demonstrated successful rescue of retinal sensitivity and structure in a Phase I/II clinical trial with a favourable immune response profile (Cehajic-Kapetanovic et al., 2020).”

    From Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis (GTAU): Understanding and mitigating the adverse immune response in retinal gene therapy (2025) · cites this paper as Cehajic-Kapetanovic et al., 2020

    The Results report improved retinal sensitivity in some patients in this Phase I/II trial, but the Discussion describes structural improvement as putative and based on detailed analysis of one patient; retinal structure remained broadly similar across the cohort. The safety findings were generally reassuring, with no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities at six months, but 7 of 9 higher-dose patients developed inflammation requiring corticosteroids. The claim overstates both structural rescue and how uniformly favourable the immune response was. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AAV vector-mediated retinal gene therapies have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for inherited retinal dystrophies.

    “Although adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated retinal gene therapies have demonstrated efficacy”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Maguire AM Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis N Engl J Med 2008 358 21 2240 8 18441370 PMC2829748

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cehajic-Kapetanovic, J., Xue, K., Martinez-Fernandez de la Camara, C., Nanda, A., Davies, A., Wood, L. J., Salvetti, A. P., Fischer, M. D., Aylward, J. W., Barnard, A. R., Jolly, J. K., Luo, E., Lujan, B. J., Ong, T., Girach, A., Black, G. C. M., Gregori, N. Z., Davis, J. L., Rosa, P. R., Lotery, A. J., Lam, B. L., Stanga, P. E., & MacLaren, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
MacLaren, Robert E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2020-02-24
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
354-359
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3008742929
Cited by
368
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 27
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • DH | National Institute for Health Research
  • Trial was sponsored by Biogen Inc.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
X-linked retinitis pigmentosa, retinal gene therapy, AAV8 vector, subretinal gene delivery, safety, visual acuity, microperimetry, central retinal thickness, photoreceptor degeneration
MeSH terms
Adult, Eye Proteins, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Retina, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Genetic Therapy, Genetic Diseases, X-Linked, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review