Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lack of immunoediting in murine pancreatic cancer reversed with neoantigen

Open access
Evans, Rebecca A., Diamond, Mark S., Rech, Andrew J., Chao, Timothy, Richardson, Max W., Lin, Jeffrey H., Bajor, David L., Byrne, Katelyn T., Stanger, Ben Z., Riley, James L., Markosyan, Nune, Winograd, Rafael, Vonderheide, Robert H.·2016·JCI Insight

Abstract

In carcinogen-driven cancers, a high mutational burden results in neoepitopes that can be recognized immunologically. Such carcinogen-induced tumors may evade this immune response through "immunoediting," whereby tumors adapt to immune pressure and escape T cell-mediated killing. Many tumors lack a high neoepitope burden, and it remains unclear whether immunoediting occurs in such cases. Here, we evaluated T cell immunity in an autochthonous mouse model of pancreatic cancer and found a low mutational burden, absence of predicted neoepitopes derived from tumor mutations, and resistance to checkpoint immunotherapy. Spontaneous tumor progression was identical in the presence or absence of T cells. Moreover, tumors arising in T cell-depleted mice grew unchecked in immune-competent hosts. However, introduction of the neoantigen ovalbumin (OVA) led to tumor rejection and T cell memory, but this did not occur in OVA immune-tolerant mice. Thus, immunoediting does not occur in this mouse model - a likely consequence, not a cause, of absent neoepitopes. Because many human tumors also have a low missense mutational load and minimal neoepitope burden, our findings have clinical implications for the design of immunotherapy for patients with such tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci.insight.88328

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Evans, R. A., Diamond, M. S., Rech, A. J., Chao, T., Richardson, M. W., Lin, J. H., Bajor, D. L., Byrne, K. T., Stanger, B. Z., Riley, J. L., Markosyan, N., Winograd, R., & Vonderheide, R. H.
Venue
JCI Insight
Published
2016-09-08
Volume
1
Issue
14
ISSN
2379-3708 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510426677
Cited by
180
References
13
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of immunoediting in murine pancreatic cancer reversed with neoantigen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci.insight.88328
The paper
Evans, R. A., Diamond, M. S., Rech, A. J., Chao, T., Richardson, M. W., Lin, J. H., Bajor, D. L., Byrne, K. T., Stanger, B. Z., Riley, J. L., Markosyan, N., Winograd, R., & Vonderheide, R. H. (2016). Lack of immunoediting in murine pancreatic cancer reversed with neoantigen. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.88328

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.