Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GLUCAGON ANTIBODIES AND AN IMMUNOASSAY FOR GLUCAGON*

Open access
Unger, Roger H., Eisentraut, Anna M., McCall, M. S., Madison, Leonard L.·1961·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Despite extensive knowledge of the amino acid composition of beef-pork glucagon, and of the physiologic changes induced by its administration to animals and man, the role of glucagon in the homeostatic regulation of blood glucose level in normal and abnormal states remains to be defined.This fundamental gap in knowledge is the result of the lack of a method sufficiently specific and sensitive to measure endogenous glucagon in body fluids.Previous efforts to assay glucagon in plasma have been based upon ability to produce either hyperglycemia in a living animal (1-3), glycogenolysis in liver slices (4), or phosphorylase activation in liver homogenates (5).There is reason to doubt the specificity of the plasma glucagon-like activity detectable by such methods (6), and their status is at present in question.The greater specificity inherent in immunoas- says (7), coupled with the unprecedented sensi- tivity provided by the paper radiochromato-elec- trophoretic techniques of Berson and co-workers (8) suggested that a radio-immunoassay for glu- cagon might provide a hitherto unequaled range of specific measurements.In a preliminary report, the antigenicity of beef-pork glucagon in rabbits was recorded and the feasibility of a radioimmunoassay for glucagon demonstrated (9).The development by Berson and Yalow of a ra- dio-immunoassay for insulin of remarkable sensi- tivity and specificity (10, 11) has validated this approach to problems of peptide hormone assay.In the following report the antigenicity of glucagon is demonstrated, glucagon antibodies are * Supported by United States Public Health Service Grant A-2700.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci104357

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Unger, R. H., Eisentraut, A. M., McCall, M. S., & Madison, L. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1961-07-01
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1280-1289
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155463777
Cited by
285
References
15
FWCI
27.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GLUCAGON ANTIBODIES AND AN IMMUNOASSAY FOR GLUCAGON*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci104357
The paper
Unger, R. H., Eisentraut, A. M., McCall, M. S., & Madison, L. L. (1961). GLUCAGON ANTIBODIES AND AN IMMUNOASSAY FOR GLUCAGON*. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci104357

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.