Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intestinal transport of dipeptides in man: relative importance of hydrolysis and intact absorption

Open access
Adibi, Siamak A., Morse, Emile L.·1971·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

A 30 cm segment of the duodenum, jejunum, or ileum of normal human volunteers was perfused, on separate occasions, with test solutions containing either glycylglycine, free glycine, glycylleucine, or equimolar amounts of free glycine and free leucine. Luminal fluid contained no hydrolytic activity against glycylglycine and minimal activity against glycylleucine. In each intestinal segment, amino acid absorption rates were significantly greater from the test solutions containing the same amount of amino acids in dipeptide than in free form(as high as 185% increase). Perfusion of each intestinal segment with a test solution containing the equimolar mixture of free glycine and free leucine always resulted in a greater leucine than glycine absorption rate. This preferential absorption of leucine, however, was either diminished (jejunum) or almost abolished (duodenum and ileum) when the glycylleucine solution instead of the equimolar mixture was presented to the intestinal mucosa. Among the three segments, the duodenum exhibited the least potential for the disappearance of dipeptides. The jejunal and ileal dipeptide disappearance rates were either similar for glycylleucine (94% vs. 92%) or slightly different for glycylglycine (92% vs. 79%). Despite lack of a remarkable difference in the disappearance rates, absorption rates of constituent amino acids were markedly greater in the jejunum than in the ileum. This reduced amino acid absorption was brought about by a greater accumulation of free amino acids in the lumen of the ileal segment (3 to 10-fold difference). Inhibition of free glycine absorption by leucine during the perfusion of the intestine with a test solution containing glycylglycine and leucine did not result in any greater concentration of free glycine in the lumen than when the glycylglycine test solution did not contain free leucine. Similarly, inhibition of free glycine and free leucine absorption by isoleucine was not accompanied by any remarkable alteration of absorption rates of the constituent amino acids of glycylleucine. The results of these studies suggest that: (a) dipeptide disappearance in the gut lumen is principally accomplished by intact absorption and not by hydrolysis; (b) intracellular hydrolysis of dipeptides is markedly greater in the ileum than in the jejunum, while dipeptide absorption rates are either similar or only slightly different in these two segments; (c) there is no appreciable hydrolysis of glycylglycine by the membrane-bound enzymes and only a small fraction of glycylleucine is hydrolyzed by these enzymes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci106724

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Adibi, S. A., & Morse, E. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1971-11-01
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
2266-2275
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096731535
Cited by
330
References
0
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal transport of dipeptides in man: relative importance of hydrolysis and intact absorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106724
The paper
Adibi, S. A., & Morse, E. L. (1971). Intestinal transport of dipeptides in man: relative importance of hydrolysis and intact absorption. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.