The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alterations in the Baroreceptor Reflex in Conscious Dogs with Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
The effectiveness of the baroreceptor reflex in conscious dogs with experimental cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure was compared with that in a group of normal conscious dogs. Cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure were produced by tricuspid avulsion and progressive pulmonary stenosis. The sensitivity of the baroreceptor reflex to transient hypertension was assessed by determining the slope of the regression line relating the prolongation of the R-R interval to the rise in systolic arterial pressure during the transient elevation of arterial pressure induced by an intravenous injection of 1-phenylephrine. The mean slope averaged 22.4+/-2.3 msec/nm Hg in 16 normal animals. 23.1 +/-1.5 in five sham-operated animals, and was significantly reduced to 8.3 +/-0.8 in 10 dogs with hypertrophy alone (P < 0.001), and to 3.3+/-0.5 in nine dogs with heart failure (P < 0.001). The response to baroreceptor hypotension was compared during bilateral carotid artery occlusion (BCO) in six normal and six heart failure dogs previously instrumented with Doppler flow transducers on the superior mesenteric and renal arteries. During BCO, in normal dogs arterial pressure increased 52+/-4 mm Hg, heart rate 33+/-2 beats/min, mesenteric resistance 0.17+/-0.03 mm Hg/ml per min, and renal resistance 0.37+/-0.10 mm Hg/ml per min. In the heart failure group all of these variables increased significantly less (P < 0.01); arterial pressure rose 25 +/-3 mm Hg, heart rate 13 +/-4 beats/min, mesenteric resistance 0.04+/-0.007 mm Hg/ml per min, and renal resistance 0.18+/-0.09 mm Hg/ml per min.Thus, in heart failure, all measured systemic and regional circulatory adjustments consequent to baroreceptor hypo- and hypertension are markedly attenuated. This study demonstrates a profound derangement of a major cardiovascular control mechanism in experimental heart failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility.
Kleiger, R. E., Stein, P. K., & Bigger, J. T. (2005) · Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology · doi:10.1111/j.1542-474x.2005.10101.x · Cited by 1,290
Vasodilator Therapy of Cardiac Failure: (First of Two Parts)
Cohn, J. N., & Franciosa, J. A. (1977) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197707072970105 · Cited by 481
Role of cardiac vagal c-fibers in cardiovascular control
Thorén, P. (1979) · Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bfb0031531 · Cited by 461
Time Domain Measurements of Heart Rate Variability
Kleiger, R. E., Stein, P. K., Bosner, M. S., & Rottman, J. N. (1992) · Cardiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8651(18)30230-3 · Cited by 383
Arterial Baroreflexes in Humans
Mancia, G., & Mark, A. L. (1983) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp020320 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgins, C. B., Vatner, S. F., Eckberg, D. L., & Braunwald, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1972-04-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 715-724
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045280290
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alterations in the Baroreceptor Reflex in Conscious Dogs with Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106865
- The paper
- Higgins, C. B., Vatner, S. F., Eckberg, D. L., & Braunwald, E. (1972). Alterations in the Baroreceptor Reflex in Conscious Dogs with Heart Failure. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.