Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma Catecholamines in Long-Term Diabetics with and without Neuropathy and in Hypophysectomized Subjects

Open access
Christensen, Niels Juel·1972·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Employing a precise and sensitive double-isotope derivative technique, plasma catecholamine concentration (PCA) was measured in four groups of subjects: (a) long-term diabetics with neuropathy, (b) long-term diabetics without neuropathy, (c) hypophysectomized long-term diabetics with neuropathy, and (d) nondiabetic control subjects. Blood samples were obtained from subjects in the supine and in the standing position. In nondiabetic control subjects, PCA (mainly noradrenaline) increased from 0.26 ng/ml in the supine positon to 0.69 and 0.72 ng/ml 5 and 10 min after assuming the standing position. By plotting this increase in PCA on the y axis in a coordinate system vs. increase in pulse rate, PCA was divided into two components: one of these depended on the rise in pulse rate on standing (called CAH) and the other corresponded to the intercept on the y axis where rise in pulse rate equals zero (CAP).Long-term diabetics with neuropathy showed a significant reduction in PCA in both the supine and the standing position. Further analysis demonstrated that CAP was considerably reduced whereas CAH was normal. Long-term diabetics without neuropahty showed normal PCA values.Surprisingly, hypophysectomized diabetics with neuropathy exhibited mean PCA values in both the supine and the standing position which were similar to those found in the nondiabetic subjects and considerably elevated compared with the findings in the nonoperated, long-term diabetics with neuropathy. Further analysis in terms of CAP and CAH demonstrated, however, that CAP was just as abnormally reduced in the hypophysectomized as it was in the nonoperated patients whereas CAH was considerably increased. In contrast to the findings in the nonoperated diabetics with neuropathy, the hypophysectomized diabetic patients with neuropathy demonstrated a negative correlation between rise in PCA and blood pressure on standing indicating that the increase in PCA was at least partially a compensatory phenomenon in the interest of the maintenance of a normal level of blood pressure. An increased sympathetic tone (vasoconstriction) is believed to be at least partially responsible for the increased capillary resistance and decreased capillary permeability occuring after hypophysectomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci106872

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Christensen, N. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1972-04-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
779-787
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085680459
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Catecholamines in Long-Term Diabetics with and without Neuropathy and in Hypophysectomized Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106872
The paper
Christensen, N. J. (1972). Plasma Catecholamines in Long-Term Diabetics with and without Neuropathy and in Hypophysectomized Subjects. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106872

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.