Cited by 81Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Investigation of the Physiological Basis for Increased Exercise Threshold for Angina Pectoris after Physical Conditioning

Open access
Sim, David N., Neill, William A.·1974·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Eight patients with coronary heart disease and exertional angina pectoris successfully completed an 11-15 wk program of endurance exercise conditioning. Angina threshold was determined by upright bicycle ergometer exercise and by atrial pacing. The product of heart rate and arterial systolic blood pressure at the exercise angina threshold was higher after conditioning. suggesting that conditioning increased the maximum myocardial O(2) supply during exercise. However, when angina was induced by atrial pacing, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, coronary blood flow, and myocardial O(2) consumption at the angina threshold were the same before and after conditioning. Myocardial lactate extraction during atrial pacing was abnormal in the same five patients before and after conditioning. Conditioning caused no detectable changes in coronary collaterals as judged by coronary arteriograms. The increase in exercise angina threshold appeared to be due to a functional adaptation in either myocardial O(2) supply or the relationship between hemodynamic work and myocardial O(2) consumption. The adaptation was limited to exercise, and did not occur during a different stress to myocardial O(2) supply, atrial pacing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci107814

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sim, D. N., & Neill, W. A.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1974-09-01
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
763-770
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983766735
Cited by
81
References
32
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
angina pectoris, exercise threshold, coronary artery disease, myocardial oxygen supply, myocardial oxygen consumption, coronary blood flow, myocardial lactate extraction, atrial pacing, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, coronary collateral circulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Angina Pectoris, Blood Pressure, Collateral Circulation, Coronary Circulation, Electric Stimulation, Physical Exertion, Heart, Heart Rate, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardium, Oxygen Consumption, Pacemaker, Artificial, Physical Education and Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review