Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thyroid Hormone Action IN VITRO CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLUBILIZED NUCLEAR RECEPTORS FROM RAT LIVER AND CULTURED GH1 CELLS

Open access
Samuels, Herbert H., Tsai, Jir S., Casanova, Juan, Stanley, Frederick·1974·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

We previously reported that putative nuclear receptors for thyroid hormone can be demonstrated by incubation of hormone either with intact GH(1) cells, a rat pituitary tumor cell line, or with isolated GH(1) cell nuclei and rat liver nuclei in vitro. We characterized further the kinetics of triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) binding and the biochemical properties of the nuclear receptor after extraction to a soluble form with 0.4 M KCl. In vitro binding of [(125)I]T3 and [(125)I]T4 with GH(1) cell and rat liver nuclear extract was examined at 0 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Equilibrium was attained within 5 min at 37 degrees C and 2 h at 0 degrees C. The binding activity from GH(1) cells was stable for at least 1 h at 37 degrees C and 10 days at - 20 degrees C. Chromatography on a weak carboxylic acid column and inactivation by trypsin and Pronase, but not by DNase or RNase, suggested that the putative receptor was a nonhistone protein. The estimated equilibrium dissociation constants (K(d)) for hormone binding to the solubilized nuclear binding activity was 1.80 x 10(-10) M (T3) and 1.20 x 10(-9) M (T4) for GH(1) cells and 1.57 x 10(-10) M (T3) and 2.0 x 10(-9) M (T4) for rat liver. These K(d) values for T3 are virtually identical to those which we previously reported with isolated rat liver nuclei and GH(1) cell nuclei in vitro. The 10-fold greater affinity for T3 compared to T4 in the nuclear extract is also identical to that observed with intact GH(1) cells. In addition, the [(125)I]T3 and [(125)I]T4 high-affinity binding in the nuclear extract were inhibited by either nonradioactive T3 or T4, which suggests that the binding activity in nuclear extract was identical for T3 and T4. In contrast, the binding activity for T4 and T3 in GH(1) cell cytosol was markedly different from that observed with nuclear extract (K(d) values were 2.87 x 10(-10) M for T4 and 1.13 x 10(-9) M for T3). Our results indicate that nuclear receptors for T3 and T4 can be isolated in a soluble and stable form with no apparent change in hormonal affinity. This should allow elucidation of the mechanisms of thyroid hormone action at the molecular level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci107825

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Samuels, H. H., Tsai, J. S., Casanova, J., & Stanley, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1974-10-01
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
853-865
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014579000
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thyroid Hormone Action IN VITRO CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLUBILIZED NUCLEAR RECEPTORS FROM RAT LIVER AND CULTURED GH1 CELLS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci107825
The paper
Samuels, H. H., Tsai, J. S., Casanova, J., & Stanley, F. (1974). Thyroid Hormone Action IN VITRO CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLUBILIZED NUCLEAR RECEPTORS FROM RAT LIVER AND CULTURED GH1 CELLS. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci107825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.