The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adherence of bacteria to heart valves in vitro.
Open accessAbstract
The abilities of 14 strains of aerobic gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli to adhere in vitro to human or canine aortic valve leaflets were compared. 2-mm sections of excised valve leaflets were obtained by punch biopsy and were incubated under standardized conditions in suspensions of bacteria. Valve sections were subsequently washed and homogenized, and quantitative techniques were used to determine the proportions of bacteria from the initial suspensions that had adhered to the valve sections. Comparable results were obtained when these adherence ratios were determined by two independent methods based either on measurements of bacterial viability or of radioactivity in 51Cr-labeled bacteria. For each bacterial strain, the adherence ratio was constant over a wide range of concentrations of bacteria in the incubation medium. Strains of enterococci, viridans streptococci, coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (adherence ratios 0.003-0.017) were found to adhere more readily to valve sections than strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (adherence ratios 0.00002-0.00004). The organisms that most frequently cause bacterial endocarditis were found to adhere best to heart valves in vitro, suggesting that the ability to adhere to valvular endothelium may be an important or essential charcteristic of bacteria that cause endocarditis in man.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks
Kluytmans, J., van Belkum, A., & Verbrugh, H. (1997) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.10.3.505 · Cited by 2,595
Clinical Microbiology of Bacterial and Fungal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Kaufman, D., & Fairchild, K. D. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.3.638-680.2004 · Cited by 435
Moreillon, P., Entenza, J. M., Francioli, P., McDevitt, D., Foster, T. J., François, P., & Vaudaux, P. (1995) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.63.12.4738-4743.1995 · Cited by 396
Reyes, M. P., & Reyes, K. C. (2008) · Current Infectious Disease Reports · doi:10.1007/s11908-008-0044-5 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, K., Ramirez-Ronda, C. H., Holmes, R. K., & Sanford, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1975-12-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1364-1370
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060582806
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence of bacteria to heart valves in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci108216
- The paper
- Gould, K., Ramirez-Ronda, C. H., Holmes, R. K., & Sanford, J. P. (1975). Adherence of bacteria to heart valves in vitro. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci108216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.