Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dihydrotestosterone binding by cultured human fibroblasts. Comparison of cells from control subjects and from patients with hereditary male pseudohermaphroditism due to androgen resistance.

Open access
Griffin, J E, Punyashthiti, K, Wilson, J D·1976·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Dihydrotestosterone binding was measured in culture fibroblasts from 14 control subjects and from 12 patients with five different types of hereditary male pseudohermaphroditism. Two assays of binding were used--an intact monolayer assay and density gradient centrifugation of cell extracts. In the intact monolayer assay of normal cells the uptake of [3H]dihydrotestosterone consisted of two components. The first was a high affinity component that exhibited saturation at approximately 1 nM dihydrotestosterone. The second was a low affinity component that was not saturable with concentrations of steroid up to 5 nM. Twice the number of high affinity binding sites were present in fibroblasts grown from genital skin (foreskin, labia majora, and scrotum) as from nongenital sites (37 vs. 14 fmol/mg protein). In the density gradient assay in 5-10% sucrose, the major peak of dihydrotestosterone binding was in the 8S region in low molarity buffer and in the 4S region in 0.5 M KCl. High affinity binding was normal in cells from two patients with familial incomplete male pseudohermaphroditism, type 2, an autosomal recessive defect in which dihydrotestosterone formation is deficient, and in cells from a patient with male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency, an autosomal recessive defect of testosterone synthesis. High affinity binding was low by both methods in fibroblasts from five patients with complete testicular feminization. Furthermore, binding by both methods was also low in cells from three subjects with familial incomplete male pseudohermaphroditism, type 1, a presumed X-linked recessive disorder of androgen resistance, and in fibroblasts grown from a subject with the incomplete form of testicular feminization. The finding that dihydrotestosterone binding is abnormal in two forms of hereditary androgen resistance in addition to complete testicular feminization suggests either that these disorders are the result of allelic mutations affecting the function of the androgen-binding protein or that normal dihydrotestosterone binding requires the participation of more than one gene product.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci108402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Griffin, J. E., Punyashthiti, K., & Wilson, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1976-05-01
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
1342-1351
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032475605
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dihydrotestosterone binding by cultured human fibroblasts. Comparison of cells from control subjects and from patients with hereditary male pseudohermaphroditism due to androgen resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci108402
The paper
Griffin, J. E., Punyashthiti, K., & Wilson, J. D. (1976). Dihydrotestosterone binding by cultured human fibroblasts. Comparison of cells from control subjects and from patients with hereditary male pseudohermaphroditism due to androgen resistance. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci108402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.