The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ornithine decarboxylase, kidney size, and the tubular hypothesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes
Open accessAbstract
In early diabetes, the kidney grows and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increases. This growth is linked to ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). The study of hyperfiltration has focused on microvascular abnormalities, but hyperfiltration may actually result from a prior increase in capacity for proximal reabsorption which reduces the signal for tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). Experiments were performed in Wistar rats after 1 week of streptozotocin diabetes. Kidney weight, ODC activity, and GFR were correlated in diabetic and control rats given difluoromethylornithine (DFMO; Marion Merrell Dow, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) to inhibit ODC. We assessed proximal reabsorption by micropuncture, using TGF as a tool for manipulating single-nephron GFR (SNGFR), then plotting proximal reabsorption versus SNGFR. ODC activity was elevated 15-fold in diabetic kidneys and normalized by DFMO, which also attenuated hyperfiltration and hypertrophy. Micropuncture data revealed an overall increase in proximal reabsorption in diabetic rats too great to be accounted for by glomerulotubular balance. DFMO prevented the overall increase in proximal reabsorption. These data confirm that ODC is required for the full effect of diabetes on kidney size and proximal reabsorption in early streptozotocin diabetes and are consistent with the hypothesis that diabetic hyperfiltration results from normal physiologic actions of TGF operating in a larger kidney, independent of any primary malfunction of the glomerular microvasculature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment
Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Smits, M. M., van Bommel, E. J., Heerspink, H. J. L., van Raalte, D. H., & Joles, J. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2016060666 · Cited by 887
Glomerular hyperfiltration: definitions, mechanisms and clinical implications
Helal, I., Fick-Brosnahan, G. M., Reed-Gitomer, B., & Schrier, R. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2012.19 · Cited by 673
Vallon, V., Gerasimova, M., Rose, M. A., Masuda, T., Satriano, J., Mayoux, E., Koepsell, H., Thomson, S. C., & Rieg, T. (2014) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00520.2013 · Cited by 483
Self-citationThe tubular hypothesis of nephron filtration and diabetic kidney disease
Vallon, V., & Thomson, S. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0256-y · Cited by 465
Self-citationVallon, V., & Thomson, S. C. (2012) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153333 · Cited by 376
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomson, S. C., Deng, A., Bao, D., Satriano, J., Blantz, R. C., & Vallon, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-224
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014339920
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ornithine decarboxylase, kidney size, and the tubular hypothesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci10963
- The paper
- Thomson, S. C., Deng, A., Bao, D., Satriano, J., Blantz, R. C., & Vallon, V. (2001). Ornithine decarboxylase, kidney size, and the tubular hypothesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci10963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.