Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of Adherence in Cytopathogenic Mechanisms of Entamoeba Histolytica

Open access
Ravdin, Jonathan I., Guerrant, Richard L.·1981·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The enteric pathogen, Entamoeba histolytica, appears to cause disease by adhering to and then destroying mucosal barriers. Using an in vitro method of studying the interaction of E. histolytica with target cells (Chinese hamster ovary [CHO] and human erythrocytes [RBC]), we examined the mechanism of amebic adherence and its role in lysis of target cells. Killing and phagocytosis of target cells by amebas ceases at 4 degrees C, allowing observation of adherence. Amebas adhere to CHO cells at 4 degrees C, 78.9% formed rosettes (amebas with >/=3 adherent CHO cells each) at 2 h. At 37 degrees C, cytochalasins B and D inhibit adherence of amebas to CHO cells (P < 0.0005). Amebas adhere to and kill CHO cells in media with <0.1 muM calcium and magnesium plus 10 mM EDTA, indicating that divalent cations are not required in the medium. Adherence of amebas to human RBC was not ABO blood group specific and showed greater adherence to human than bovine or sheep RBC (P < 0.005). Neither Fc nor complement receptors were found on amebas by standard rosette studies. The amebic adherence receptor is not trypsin (0.125%) sensitive nor inhibited by trypan blue (1 mM). N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (GALNAc) inhibited the adherence of amebas to CHO cells and human RBC (0.1 g/100 ml or 4.5 mM GALNAc, P < 0.005) by binding to a receptor on the amebic surface. GALNAc abolishes amebic cytolysis of target CHO cells (determined by (111)Indium oxine release from CHO cells, P < 0.001) but not amebic phagocytosis of CHO cells. By suspending ameba-CHO cells rosettes in dextran, we found that GALNAc (1%) reversibly inhibits amebic adherence (P < 0.0005) and that cytochalasins decrease amebic killing of adherent CHO cells (P < 0.025). These findings indicate that the adherence of E. histolytica to target cells requires microfilament function, is via a specific amebic receptor that has affinity for GALNAc, and is required to lyse cells. Inhibition of the adherence of E. histolytica may alter the pathogenicity of this organism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci110377

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Metadata

Authors
Ravdin, J. I., & Guerrant, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1981-11-01
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1305-1313
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1763341724
Cited by
370
References
13
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Adherence in Cytopathogenic Mechanisms of Entamoeba Histolytica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci110377
The paper
Ravdin, J. I., & Guerrant, R. L. (1981). Role of Adherence in Cytopathogenic Mechanisms of Entamoeba Histolytica. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci110377

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.